Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Arvind Bhardwaj v. Sana Realtors Pvt Ltd

01 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4625
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause ceases to operate when the original contract is discharged and replaced by a subsequent sale deed settling the dispute, dismissing the petition for appointment of an arbitrator.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 arbitration clause contract discharge

Pradeep Kumar Agrawal & Ors. v. Mahipal Singh & Ors.

01 Jun 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4626
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for non-pecuniary damages and increased interest rate in a motor accident claim, modifying the tribunal's award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency non-pecuniary damages interest rate

Poonam & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi

01 Jun 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:4611

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused in an acid attack case arising from a family dispute, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary despite specific allegations.

criminal bail_granted anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. acid attack family dispute

Harinder Singh Gujral v. State (NCT of Delhi)

01 Jun 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:4612

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail and permitted the petitioner to travel abroad, holding that unsubstantiated allegations and cooperation with investigation justify bail and travel despite pending criminal and civil proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. outraging modesty Section 354 IPC

Gillette India Limited v. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd

01 Jun 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:4613

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining use of the plaintiff's distinctive razor color in a disparaging advertisement while emphasizing that false or unsubstantiated comparative claims require independent evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant disparaging advertisement commercial speech interim injunction false advertising

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Satya Narain Sharma and Ors.

01 Jun 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4627

The insurer is entitled to avoid liability and recover compensation paid when the driver held a fake driving license and the insured fails to prove its genuineness or lack of knowledge thereof.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle accident third party insurance fake driving license burden of proof

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Santosh & Ors.

01 Jun 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4628

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the tribunal's award holding the insurer liable as the insurance policy was valid on the date of the accident.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed motor accident claim insurance policy validity insurance cancellation third party risk

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. RAVI & ORS.

01 Jun 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4629

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal for recovery against the owner and driver due to the driver's invalid license and remitted the matter for reconsideration by the tribunal.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance policy breach driving license validity third party insurance

Devinder Singh v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

01 Jun 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4630

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim to include loss of income during treatment, future loss due to permanent disability, medical expenses, and loss of amenities of life, correcting the tribunal's inadequate award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement loss of income permanent disability

Rekha v. State

01 Jun 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:4608

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of Rekha and Sheetal for forcing a minor into prostitution, affirming the presumption under Section 6(2A) of the ITP Act and rejecting claims of consent and procedural irregularities.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act Section 6(2A) ITP Act minor forced prostitution presumption of trafficking

P.K. Wadhwa v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Jun 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:4614

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation against his transfer and restrained coercive action until a reasoned decision is communicated.

administrative other transfer order mala fide bias representation

Kuruvila Kuriakose v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Jun 2016 · J. R. Midha · 2016:DHC:4639

The Delhi High Court allowed a senior citizen's petition directing issuance of a No Objection Certificate for transferring registration of a vehicle over 15 years old to Kerala, permitting fitness testing locally and accepting an undertaking not to ply the vehicle in Delhi.

administrative petition_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate vehicle registration transfer fitness certificate Motor Vehicles Act

Meera Mishra v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Jun 2016 · J. R. Midha · 2016:DHC:4640

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s writ petition directing issuance of NOC for out-of-state vehicle registration upon fitness certification, subject to the vehicle not being used in the National Capital Region.

administrative petition_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate Motor Vehicles Act National Green Tribunal vehicle fitness certificate

Shyam Pal v. State (NCT of Delhi)

31 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:9112

The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to treat the writ petitions as parole representations and decide them expeditiously within ten working days, reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek further relief if needed.

criminal other parole representation Article 226 Constitution of India Section 482 CrPC expeditious disposal

MAXFORT SCHOOL PARWANA ROAD PITAMPURA v. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION

31 May 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:8930

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions as infructuous after the respondent withdrew the challenged administrative order during proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition administrative order withdrawal of order infructuous petition

Manish v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

31 May 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; S. Muralidhar; S. S. Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:8909-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse if compensation is not paid within five years as per Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and such proceedings were declared lapsed in respect of the petitioner's land.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 acquisition proceedings lapse non-payment of compensation

M/S Core Fiscal Services Pvt Ltd v. NCT of Delhi

31 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4602-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving private offences based on an amicable settlement between parties, subject to compensation to victims.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 Cr.P.C. private offences

Union of India v. M/S. Ved Prakash Arora & Anr.

31 May 2016 · V.K. Shali · 2016:DHC:4601

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal against an arbitral award as barred by limitation and directed an inquiry into the officials' delay in prosecuting the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37 appeal Limitation period Condonation of delay

Sunil Bihari v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

31 May 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:4549

Delhi High Court upheld convictions of four appellants for violent attack in Tis Hazari lockup but acquitted five others due to lack of specific evidence and unreliable identifications.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC constructive liability mass violence

Sunil Bihari v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

31 May 2016 · Mukta Gupta, J. · 2016:DHC:4548

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of four appellants for violent unlawful assembly in a police lockup while acquitting others due to lack of specific evidence and unreliable witness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC constructive liability mass brawl