Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Union of India through Sr.D.E.E(G) North Central Railway v. Jitco Overseas Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to arbitral awards must be filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissed the petition under the 1940 Act, and allowed enforcement of the award in favor of the respondent.
Air France Ground Handling Pvt. Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and final dissolution of Air France Ground Handling Pvt. Ltd. upon satisfaction of all statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.
Kring Tellabs India Pvt. Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up of Kring Tellabs India Pvt. Ltd. after finding full compliance with statutory requirements under Section 497 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Maps Food & Beverage Services Private Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and ordered final dissolution of Maps Food & Beverage Services Private Limited upon full compliance with statutory requirements under Section 497 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Ex-Servicemen Garuda Carriers Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up of Ex-Servicemen Garuda Carriers Pvt. Ltd., holding that all statutory compliances under Section 497 of the Companies Act, 1956 were met and ordered final dissolution effective from the petition filing date.
M/S GORKHA SECURITY SERVICES v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the reasonableness of tender conditions relating to age and substitution clauses and declined to interfere with the tender process except noting the respondents' assurance to rectify financial eligibility anomalies.
M/S GORKHA SECURITY SERVICES v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the reasonableness of tender conditions for facility management services, dismissed the petition challenging age and substitution clauses, and accepted the respondents' assurance to rectify an inconsistency in eligibility criteria.
Rajender Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape and criminal intimidation charges, holding that the prosecutrix's testimony was not credible and the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Mukesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants convicted for robbery under Sections 392/34 and 397 IPC due to improbabilities and contradictions in the prosecution case and lack of corroborative evidence.
Mukesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants convicted for robbery under Sections 392/34 and 397 IPC due to improbabilities and lack of corroborative evidence in the prosecution case.
Jakir Malik v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and rape charges, holding that the prosecutrix was above the age of consent and voluntarily accompanied him, and that the prosecution failed to prove the offences beyond reasonable doubt.
Shriprakash Dwivedi v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC based on a lawful matrimonial settlement and consent of the complainant's authorized representative, subject to compliance with maintenance and compensation conditions.
Navdeep Passi v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between siblings concerning misappropriation of retiral benefits, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Vardhman Estates & Developers Private Limited v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420/34 IPC arising from a private commercial dispute amicably settled by the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sangeeta Chauhan v. Rumali Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the owner's right to possession, rejecting the appellant's claim of an irrevocable license and defense based on an unregistered agreement to sell.
Sunil Bihari v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of four appellants for unlawful assembly and assault in a jail lockup incident while acquitting others due to insufficient and unreliable evidence.
Sunil Bihari v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of some appellants for unlawful assembly and assault in a lockup riot while acquitting others due to lack of specific evidence and unreliable identification.
Union of India through Sr.D.E.E(G) North Central Railway v. Jitco Overseas Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under the Arbitration Act, 1940 challenging an arbitral award, holding that the 1996 Act applies and no valid objections under Section 34 were pending, thereby allowing the award to be enforced.
Union of India through Sr.D.E.E(G) North Central Railway v. Jitco Overseas Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940, holding that the 1996 Act applies and no valid objections under Section 34 were pending, thus the award is enforceable.
Union of India through Sr.D.E.E(G) North Central Railway v. Jitco Overseas Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that petitions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 challenging an arbitral award are not maintainable once the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies, dismissed the petition, and allowed the award-holder to recover the awarded amount.