Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Kishan Chand v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that employees denied second financial upgradation under the ACP scheme due to departmental failure to send them for pre-promotional courses are entitled to the benefit from the date of completing 24 years of service, subject to eligibility.
Kishan Chand v. Union of India
Delhi High Court held that employees denied timely pre-promotional courses under the ACP scheme are entitled to second financial upgradation from the date of 24 years of service, directing grant of benefits with arrears and interest.
Ram Kishan Kataria v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that employees denied second financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme due to departmental failure to send them for pre-promotional courses are entitled to the benefit upon completion of 24 years of service, subject to verification.
Kishan Chand v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that employees denied pre-promotional courses by the department are entitled to second financial upgradation under the ACP scheme from the date of completing 24 years of service, directing grant of benefits with arrears and interest.
Ram Kishan Kataria v. Union of India; Abul Hasan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that failure of the department to send employees for mandatory pre-promotional courses under the ACP Scheme does not disentitle them from financial upgradation upon completion of requisite service.
Ram Niwas v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that promotees to Head Constable rank must have their pay fixed at the minimum prescribed for direct recruits under the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, to rectify pay anomalies effective from January 1, 2006.
Delhi Development Authority v. Subhash Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order reinstating an employee where forgery of experience certificate was not conclusively proved and the employee met eligibility criteria.
K.P. Jayaram v. The State of NCT Delhi
Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of fraud and cheating in a commercial dispute, emphasizing the civil nature of the dispute and the petitioner’s cooperation with investigation.
Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that plots allotted by NDMC under restrictive terms remain municipal property, and unauthorized construction and non-dairy use do not confer ownership rights on licensees.
Vivek Kumar Jaiswal & Ors v. Airport Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Airport Authority of India's application of cut-off marks and deletion of out-of-syllabus questions in departmental recruitment, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to their exclusion from interview.
State (GNCT of Delhi) v. Nitin
The High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of the accused due to contradictory statements by the prosecutrix and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the need for prima facie material before framing charges.
Hitesh Arora v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment case, finding no prima facie evidence for custodial interrogation and emphasizing cooperation with investigation.
Bhavanshu & Anr v. The State of N.C.T of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs involving minor injuries under Sections 308, 323, 324, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the interest of justice and harmony.
Shivam & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross-registered FIRs under IPC sections 325, 324, 323, 452, and 34 based on a bona fide settlement between the parties and their voluntary withdrawal of complaints.
Mr. Haresh Vardhan,Advocate v. STATE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the IT Act based on a voluntary settlement between the complainant and accused, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Dushyanth Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to make detailed representations on pay disparity in CISF constables and respondents to pass speaking orders considering the 2015 pay fixation anomaly judgment before judicial relief can be granted.
Videocon Telecommunications Ltd v. Tower Vision India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed Videocon's appeals by granting interim relief from deposit directions, subject to an undertaking and asset disclosure, leaving the merits to be decided independently by the Single Judge.
Pankaj Kumar Parihar v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal of a CISF constable for habitual overstaying of leave, holding the disciplinary inquiry fair and the penalty proportionate.
Pramod Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CRPF personnel posted in Jammu & Kashmir, North Eastern region, or Left Wing Extremist areas are entitled to retain family accommodation allotted in Delhi without penal rent for the duration of such posting, quashing unauthorized penal rent deductions.
Diya Sudhir Kumar v. Chinmaya Vidyalaya
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition restoring minors' admissions under the EWS category upon production of fresh authentic income certificates, emphasizing protection of minors' educational rights despite alleged parental misdeeds.