Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Shasi Kant v. Union of India; Nand Lal Dahariya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to reconsider the petitioners' eligibility for the post of Principal by disposing of their representations with a speaking order after hearing them, without adjudicating on the merits.
Kalyan Toll Infrastructure Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that appointment of an arbitrator from a restricted panel of retired government officers violates principles of impartiality, and appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
INSP/GD Jitender Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
Exoneration in disciplinary proceedings does not entitle refund of amounts recovered under separate financial loss proceedings in service matters.
MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication after providing a fair hearing.
Shri Krishna Industries v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
Zebronics India Pvt Ltd v. Pushpender Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition challenging dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is not maintainable when an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) CPC is available, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Sonu Sharma and Others v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Mohammad Areesh Saifi v. Directorate of Education & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that unaided private schools must admit EWS children shortlisted through the Directorate of Education’s computerized draw of lots under the RTE Act, regularizing provisional admission despite unsubstantiated financial objections.
Shri Tarun Chander Malik v. M/S Varahi Diamonds and Finance Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that conflicting court jurisdiction and arbitration clauses in a lease deed must be harmoniously construed to uphold arbitration and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rishabh Kumar Gupta @Reshu & Ors. v. State Through SHO P.S. New Ashok Nagar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A/323/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Raman Batra & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SMT. PREETI WIFE OF DECEASED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging the involvement of the offending vehicle in a fatal motor accident, upholding the Tribunal's award based on credible eyewitness and investigation evidence.
Godavari Projects (J.V) v. Union of India
Delhi High Court held that a contractual proviso delaying arbitration until alternative arrangements are made does not bar arbitration and appointed an independent arbitrator despite insolvency proceedings against a joint venture member.
Parul Gaur v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere via Habeas Corpus in a custody dispute pending before the Mahila Court, directing the petitioner to seek telephonic contact with her children through the Ministry of External Affairs.
CCS Computers Private Limited v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a blacklisting order for lack of reasoned decision and violation of natural justice, directing fresh proceedings with proper notice and opportunity to respond.
Riteesh Mohan Bakshi & Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection to petitioners against a forest department notice alleging encroachment, directing due process and consideration of ownership claims before coercive action.
M/S PRACHI INFRA AND ROADS PVT. LTD. v. M/S KANTI PRASHAD MITTAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a direction for CBI enquiry into unauthorized subcontracting under a government infrastructure contract, emphasizing that disputed factual issues require investigation and parties cannot rely on project experience pending enquiry.
SWISS BIKE VERTRIEBS GMBH SUBSIDIARY OF ACCELL GROUP v. RELIANCE BRANDS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant's use of the mark 'RALLEYZ' for bicycles, holding it deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'RALEIGH' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
AMAR ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and prior notice, and modified the cancellation to take effect from the Show Cause Notice date instead of an earlier retrospective date.
S SRI RADHA KRISHNA INTERNATIONAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failing to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with an opportunity to be heard.