Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Vinod Shivan v. Laxmi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Family Court's rejection of a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, holding that the appellant failed to prove a valid marriage and was guilty of stalking and harassment.
Vipin Kumar Jain & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court reversed the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that admission of cheque issuance against invoices creates a presumption of liability that cannot be rebutted by unsubstantiated claims of security deposits.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admissions in statutory notice reply establish debt and issuance of cheques, and unsubstantiated security deposit claims do not rebut the presumption of liability.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court overturned the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that admissions in statutory notice replies establish liability for dishonoured cheques absent credible rebuttal.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused for dishonour of 61 cheques under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admissions in the statutory notice reply rebutted the defence of security deposit.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused for dishonour of 61 cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that admissions in reply to statutory notice establish liability and unsubstantiated security deposit claims cannot rebut the presumption of debt.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court reversed the acquittal and convicted the accused for dishonour of 61 cheques under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt in reply to statutory notice negates the defence of security deposit.
Prasant Jain & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Lalit Sharma & Anr v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Kailash & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jaspal Singh & Ors. v. Satnam Kaur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Siraj Khan @ Sirajuddin & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 452, 323, 506, 427, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Brijesh Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Harjeet Singh & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under the Trade Marks and Copyright Acts based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Manish Babra v. Renu
The Delhi High Court set aside a decree of restitution of conjugal rights passed without evidence, holding that such relief requires proof and cannot be granted alongside a divorce petition.
Maharaj I S Wahi v. Renuka Wahi
The Delhi High Court held that a party is entitled to lead rebuttal evidence after closing its case without expressly reserving the right, and allowed the petitioner to prove emails denied by the respondent during cross-examination.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAMESH & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award based on claimant's actual qualification and disability, allowing interest except for adjournment period due to disability certificate delay.
Aashish Gupta v. Central Board of Excise & Customs
The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative allotment of the petitioner to Chandigarh zone based on merit and vacancy availability despite his preference for Delhi, dismissing his challenge to the recruitment process.
Karan Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition under the 1894 Act lapses if compensation is not paid within five years as per the 2013 Act, allowing the petitioners' claim for lapse of acquisition.