Delhi High Court
71,423 judgments
Ishwar Singh Decd. Through Lrs. & Ors. v. Suraj Bhan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts have jurisdiction over disputes concerning transfer of bhumidari rights, invalidated mutation in favor of appellants, and upheld the respondents' title and possession rights under valid transfer documents.
Jasbirkaur v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions seeking quashing of FIRs following a settlement between parties, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions based on compromise.
Sanjay & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a trivial quarrel causing simple injuries after the parties amicably settled their dispute, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose.
Girishchawla v. Rishidev Sharma Delhi Co-Operative Group Housing Society Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions as satisfied after the respondent assured issuance of TDS certificates following deposit of TDS amounts related to arbitral awards.
Mewell Biotech Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Taranjeet Singh
The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petitions as withdrawn following an arbitration settlement between the parties.
Bhola Ram Patel v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court clarified that NDMC may remove street vendors obstructing public pathways while respecting pre-existing rights and seniority pending final adjudication by the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Vishnu Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court disposed of two connected applications by referring to its earlier detailed judgment in a related appeal, without granting separate relief.
Vishnu Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court disposed of two applications seeking clarification and directions by referring to its detailed judgment in a connected appeal.
Raghunandan Sharma v. Jai Kumari & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging rights in immovable property subject to a decree is barred under Order XXI Rule 101 CPC and must be adjudicated in execution proceedings, allowing the appeal and setting aside the decree in favor of the respondents.
Sh. Surender Singh @ Sunder & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decision granting the daughter of the deceased landowner her rightful share in compensation for acquired land, emphasizing that mutation does not confer title and uncontested claims must be accepted.
SYSDIVA CONSULTANTS PVT LTD & ANR v. FSL SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court disposed of a copyright infringement-related suit by accepting the defendants' undertaking against tortious interference and defamatory statements, with the plaintiffs relinquishing damages claims.
Raj Singh v. The Commissioner of Police & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld departmental enquiry findings against a police constable for unauthorized vehicle release, ruling that acquittal in criminal trial does not bar departmental proceedings based on preponderance of probabilities.
Devendra Kumar v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court held that arbitral awards under Section 7B(2) of The Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 by MTNL are final and not challengeable under the Arbitration Act, allowing challenge only via writ petition under Article 226.
M/S Sentinel Consultants Pvt Ltd v. Sudhir Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an executing court cannot examine unestablished allegations of fraud behind a decree for specific performance, upheld the decree's validity, and dismissed the application to recall execution orders.
Rajinder Vohra v. M/S Fountain Logde Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the suit for specific performance and cancellation of sale deed as barred by limitation and under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC due to prior withdrawal of an identical suit without permission.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Mohd. Chand
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to unreliable witness testimony, unexplained FIR delay, and lack of forensic evidence linking the recovered material to the crime.
Stratford Academy Ltd v. FIITJEE Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Stratford Academy Ltd. and FIITJEE Ltd. under the Companies Act, 1956, allowing amalgamation without convening meetings and subject to statutory compliances.
Sanjay Gambhir v. BDR Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside a blanket restraint order against a guarantor's assets in arbitration proceedings due to lack of credible evidence supporting the claimed loan amount.
ARIO INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. GAIL GAS LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that an unconditional bank guarantee securing mobilization advance can be invoked despite contractual disputes unless there is established egregious fraud, dismissing ARIO's petition to restrain invocation.
Ram Mohan Gupta v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. upholding the dismissal of the application under Section 210 Cr.P.C. by the lower courts, relying on prior coordinate bench rulings on connected complaints.