Full Text
Translation output
$-20-21 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 215/2010 & Crl.M.A. 779/2010 , JASBIRKAUR
Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs.
STATE
CRL.M.C. 215/2010 & Crl.M.A. 779/2010 , JASBIRKAUR
Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs.
STATE
VERSUS
Respondent Represented by: Ms. Ra>i Gupta, APP with
Insp. Seema Singh.
Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Ms. Ankita Vashisht, Advs. for R-2.
Insp. Seema Singh.
Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Ms. Ankita Vashisht, Advs. for R-2.
CRL.M.C. 1704/2011
PUSHPINDER KAUR & ORS.
STATE & ANR.
Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Ms. Ankita Vashisht, Advs.
PUSHPINDER KAUR & ORS.
STATE & ANR.
Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Ms. Ankita Vashisht, Advs.
VERSUS
Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI
Harbir PS R.K. Puram.
Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs. for R-2.
Harbir PS R.K. Puram.
Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
27.09.2016 Learned counsels for petitioners in both the petitions state that parties have finally arrived at a settlement before the Mediatioh Centre Dwarka
27.09.2016 Learned counsels for petitioners in both the petitions state that parties have finally arrived at a settlement before the Mediatioh Centre Dwarka
CRL.M.C. 215/2010 &CRL.M.C. 1704/2011 P^ge 1 of2
2016:DHC:8983
- •)
Courts on 6 June, 2016. In terms of the settlement the parties are proceeding forward and statement for first motion for divorce by mutual consent has already been recorded and order passed thereon on 3'"'^ August, 2016.
Since by the two petitions the petitioners are seeking quashing of respective FIRs against them on merits, learned counsel for the petitioners seek leave to withdraw the petitions in terms ofthe settlement with liberty to file fresh petitions on the basis ofcompromise arrived at between the parties.
Leave and liberty granted.
Petitions and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 'ga'
2016:DHC:8983
- •)
Courts on 6 June, 2016. In terms of the settlement the parties are proceeding forward and statement for first motion for divorce by mutual consent has already been recorded and order passed thereon on 3'"'^ August, 2016.
Since by the two petitions the petitioners are seeking quashing of respective FIRs against them on merits, learned counsel for the petitioners seek leave to withdraw the petitions in terms ofthe settlement with liberty to file fresh petitions on the basis ofcompromise arrived at between the parties.
Leave and liberty granted.
Petitions and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 'ga'
CRL.M.C 215/2010 & CRL.M.C. 1704/2011 page2 of2
2016:DHC:8983
2016:DHC:8983
JUDGMENT