Delhi High Court
67,253 judgments
Ankit Thakran and Anr. v. The Registrar General
The Delhi High Court upheld its selection procedure for Junior Judicial Assistants, ruling that excluding space bars in typing speed calculation was lawful and the petitioners' challenge was dismissed.
Ajyodha Prasad v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that back wages are discretionary and granted the petitioner 50% back wages for the period of wrongful disengagement, balancing equities given the petitioner was not at fault.
Gruner India Private Limited v. Director of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing)-1
The Delhi High Court held that aggregation or desegregation of related international transactions for transfer pricing is fact-dependent and remitted the matter for fresh examination of appropriate method and aggregation under the Income Tax Act.
Ritu Taneja v. Ganga International School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging termination of a teacher, holding that her resignation broke continuity of service and concealment of alternative employment disentitled her from relief under the Delhi School Education Act.
Gaya Devi v. Delhi Transco Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking correction of date of birth in service records, holding that the petitioner’s claim was barred by delay and knowledge of the recorded date through salary slips.
Poonam Tanwar v. Sube Singh Tanwar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that a wife’s right to residence is enforceable only against her husband and not against the father-in-law who owns the ancestral property, and that the discretionary relief of permanent injunction was rightly denied.
Bhim Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that landowners who accepted compensation and a Special Rehabilitation Package with undertakings relinquishing all rights prior to the 2013 Act cannot claim benefits under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Sunil Gupta v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted probate to the petitioner as sole executor of a duly registered and valid Will dated 24.07.2010 executed by late Sh. D.R. Gupta, limited to specified immovable properties.
Dhirender Kumar v. Sanjiv Kumar
Delhi High Court allowed appeal holding that signed blank loan documents were misused by lender to claim fictitious loan, setting aside concurrent findings and dismissing suit.
Naresh Kumar v. State of Delhi; Mahender Kumar v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of two brothers for murder under Section 302/34 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and common intention, rejecting the defence of non-examination of a peripheral witness and challenges to related witnesses' credibility.
Suganpandey v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions by long-standing street vendors seeking protection from interference, granting liberty to approach the court if their vending rights are threatened in the future.
M/S D.N. Paper Marketing v. M/S Tikmany Paper P. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a cheque bounce case where the defence of defective goods and issuance of cheques as security was found to have rebutted the presumption of liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Raj Kumar v. Kewalkumar Sharma & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed two contempt petitions as not pressed after the petitioners chose not to proceed with them at the hearing stage.
Modtech Projects (India) Private Limited v. Modtech Material Handling Projects Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after finding procedural compliance and no objections from statutory authorities.
Augere Wireless Broadband India Private Limited v. Bharti Airtel Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Augere Wireless Broadband India Private Limited and Bharti Airtel Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after resolving statutory objections and procedural compliance.
Mussoorie Trading Company Private Limited v. Jaigeet Trading Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Demerger between two companies, dispensing with shareholder meetings due to unanimous written consent and absence of creditors.
Akira Marketing Private Limited v. Azure Hospitality Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with certain meetings based on unanimous consent and directing meetings of unsecured creditors where required.
Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited v. Carnation Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Narmada Asbestos Pipes Pvt. Ltd. and Carnation Developers Pvt. Ltd. under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the Transferor Company without winding up, subject to statutory compliances.
Air Factory Energy Limited v. Anest Iwata Motherson Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company under sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings and ordering dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.