Delhi High Court
67,253 judgments
Chanderkanta Private ITI v. Directorate General of Training and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking mandamus for accreditation and affiliation due to the petitioner's failure to upload required replies to Non-Conformities on the official portal and inability to meet the minimum training period before examinations.
Shiv Shakti Cylinders v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that forfeiture of earnest money was justified due to the appellant's failure to submit the factory license by the stipulated deadline as required under the tender and Letter of Intent.
Mohd Shahzad v. Manju Luthra & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the decree of possession based on admissions but granted the appellant limited time to vacate the premises upon deposit of part of outstanding charges.
Rajiv Kumar v. Director ITBP and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a 20-year-old removal order, holding that extreme delay without sufficient explanation and acquittal in criminal proceedings do not justify reinstatement or condonation of delay under Article 226.
Central Market Sector-6 Dwarka Welfare Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn a writ petition seeking enforcement of earlier orders for removal of encroachments on public land, emphasizing prior compliance and the petitioner’s choice to seek alternative remedies.
ICICIBANK LTD v. LALIT KUMAR
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's petition under Article 227 to appoint a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle to protect its security in a loan recovery suit, emphasizing a pragmatic approach under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC.
Abhishek Garg v. The Union of India & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by a CAG employee, holding that service disputes fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal, not the High Court.
Birpal Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the medical board's decision declaring the petitioner unfit to continue as a driver beyond 55 years, dismissing the writ petition challenging the administrative tribunal's order.
Pepsico Inc & Anr. v. M/S. Sagarnil Enterprise & Ors.
Delhi High Court held it lacked territorial jurisdiction over a trademark infringement suit filed by PepsiCo, directing the plaint to be returned for filing at the plaintiffs' principal place of business in Gurgaon.
Krishan Radhu v. The Emmar MGF Construction Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement mandates referral of disputes to arbitration if invoked before filing the written statement, and the defendant's application under Section 8 was rightly allowed despite the lapse of the written statement filing period.
Oxbridge Associates Limited v. Atul Kumra
The Delhi High Court directed the defendant to deposit the disputed advance payment amount as security under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC, taking a prima facie view of the plaintiff's claim amid pending proceedings threatening recovery.
Shailendra Dania and Ors. v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Single Judge's order granting promotions to SC/ST candidates, holding that the Board complied with reservation and promotion rules including distinct quotas and qualifying service for diploma and degree holders.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Delhi (Slums) SC/ST Engineers Association
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board by applying the reasoning in a connected case, setting aside the impugned orders against it.
Rama Sinha v. State Thr. CBI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's procedure in summoning the petitioner as a court witness and refusal to summon certain witnesses, affirming that the trial court complied with prior directions and that the petitioner failed to establish the necessity of the witnesses sought.
Shyam Murti Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant’s conviction for robbery under Section 392 IPC but set aside the separate sentence under Section 397 IPC, clarifying the complementary nature of Section 397.
Narayan v. State
The Delhi High Court disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 565/2014 by referring to a detailed common judgment in a connected appeal, without recording a separate decision.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd v. C. Madhu
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging Tribunal orders due to inordinate delay and inadequate explanation, emphasizing that inadvertence is insufficient to condone such delay.
Nisha Priya Bhatia v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered for non-cognizable offences investigated without magistrate's permission, holding that hurling abuses does not constitute house trespass under Section 451 IPC.
M/S MAHAVIR TRANSMISSION UDYOG PVT. LTD v. M/S REAL POWER UTILITY & ORS.
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of Rs. 2.35 crore with interest to the plaintiff company for supply of ACSR conductors, rejecting defendants' claims of defective goods and lack of jurisdiction.
Anup Sharma & Ors. v. Nagendra Prasad Yadav
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to set aside an ex parte decree for specific performance due to unjustified delay and insufficient explanation for condonation of delay.