Delhi High Court
32,166 judgments
Shri Satish Kumar Sakuja v. M/s. Appolo Cranes Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed defendants to deposit disputed advance payments conditionally, finding their defence improbable but possible, thus refusing summary judgment but facilitating expeditious resolution under Order XIII-A CPC.
Rahul Kumar Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to delayed arrest, failure of eyewitness identification, prolonged trial, and good conduct during incarceration, subject to stringent conditions.
N B Footcare v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to improper communication of the Show Cause Notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Mangal Deep v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court ruling.
Pawan Kumar & Ors. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, exercising its power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Larsen and Toubro Limited and Passavant Energy and Environment GmbH JV v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of the petitioners' rectification application under the GST Act for lack of hearing and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, while noting the validity of related notifications is pending before the Supreme Court.
Balajee Metal Industries v. Bir Bhan Jindal
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to issue summons to a witness not under his control to ensure fair trial in a commercial suit, while cautioning against misuse of the process.
Dabur India Limited v. Patanjali Ayurved Limited and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that advertisements by Patanjali for 'Special Chyawanprash' disparaged Dabur's product and other Ayurvedic Chyawanprash, granting interim injunction against such misleading and disparaging ads.
Dinesh Kumar v. Subhash Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut statutory presumptions and concurrent findings of the lower courts were rightly upheld.
Mohammad Kashif & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.
Sh. Arpit Tyagi and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Ravi Kumar Meena v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under motor vehicle and BNS provisions based on a genuine settlement between the parties, affirming the principle that criminal proceedings can be ended where continuation would be unjust.
Shahbaz Alam Khan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under IPC and POCSO Act based on an amicable settlement between cousins, holding that proceeding with trial was not in the interest of justice.
Om Tripathi v. The State NCT of Delhi
Interim bail was granted for two weeks on humanitarian grounds due to the accused's mother's urgent medical surgery and lack of family support.
Khuja Agha Safi v. Customs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a foreign national accused of possessing commercial quantity of heroin, holding that delay in trial caused by the accused does not override the stringent bail provisions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Sachin Tomar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
M/S Cottage Arts Emporium v. Indian Tourism Development Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that the Limitation Act applies to recovery of damages under Section 7(2) of the Public Premises Act and that a Government Company cannot claim extended limitation under Article 112, rendering the respondent's damages claim time-barred.
Mukul Sharma and Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Ajay Kumar Jha v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related criminal proceedings under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process of law.
Kamal Jeet v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.