Neelam Sharma and Anr. v. Sameer Kumar

Delhi High Court · 03 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:5296
Tara Vitasta Ganju
C.R.P. 182/2025
2025:DHC:5296
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition as withdrawn without examining merits, leaving all rights open for trial court adjudication.

Full Text
Translation output
C.R.P. 182/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 03.07.2025
C.R.P. 182/2025, CM APPL. 37430/2025
NEELAM SHARMA AND ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Abhijat Bal, Sr. Adv.
WITH
Mr.Adv.[appearance not given.]
VERSUS
SAMEER KUMAR .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Hitensh Bhardwaj, Mr. M.D.
Faiz, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
JUDGMENT

1. After some arguments, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition.

2. The Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The pending Application stands closed.

3. It is clarified that this Court has not examined the matter on merits. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be adjudicated before the learned Trial Court.