Delhi High Court

32,373 judgments

Year:

Poonam Gandhi v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.

03 Jul 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025 INSC 504

The High Court upheld the deletion of certain relatives from domestic violence proceedings due to absence of a domestic relationship and lack of specific allegations, emphasizing cautious use of criminal law in family disputes.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 domestic relationship separate household Section 482 CrPC

State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi v. Amit

03 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:5181

The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration and procedural irregularities justify bail despite statutory embargo.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A NDPS bail prolonged incarceration

Coromandel Indag Products India Ltd. v. Sumitomo Chemical Company Ltd. & Anr.

03 Jul 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:5192

The Delhi High Court rejected the plaint filed by the parent company for trademark and copyright infringement, holding it lacked locus standi and failed to disclose a cause of action, as the licensed group company alone had the right to sue.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC locus standi trademark license passing off

Pawan v. The State of NCT of Delhi

03 Jul 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:5263

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner charged with murder under Section 302 IPC, citing failure of the sole eyewitness to identify him and prolonged pre-trial detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 302 IPC eyewitness identification prolonged pre-trial detention

Sudama Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Jul 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:5204

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the POCSO Act based on consistent child victim testimony corroborated by independent witnesses and medical evidence despite minor discrepancies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act child sexual abuse child witness testimony medical evidence

Jacqueline Fernandez v. Directorate of Enforcement

03 Jul 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:5236
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of PMLA proceedings against Jacqueline Fernandez, holding that prima facie material discloses offences under PMLA and that prosecution is maintainable despite her being a witness in the predicate offence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act proceeds of crime predicate offence knowledge mens rea

M/S INDOJ CONSULTANT PVT. LTD. v. SHRI GOVIND MISHRA

02 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6141
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed revision to grant possession to the landlord on admissions of tenancy and expiry of lease under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of summary judgment application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions landlord-tenant relationship tenancy expiry

Chaudhary Shareef Ahmad and Ors. v. Government of N.C.T of Delhi and Ors.

02 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:5384

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions concerning internal disputes of the now-dissolved Delhi Waqf Board due to non-prosecution and mootness of the issues.

administrative appeal_dismissed Waqf Board infructuous dispute non-prosecution dismissal in default

The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission v. Balvendra Kumar Nain

02 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5174-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction to SSC to revisit recruitment results for Ex-Servicemen Special Category posts due to verification errors, emphasizing fairness over finality clauses.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Staff Selection Commission Ex-Servicemen Special Category Recruitment notification Verification error

Alcon Builders and Engineer Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.

02 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5306-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal's cost award under pre-amended Section 31(8) of the A&C Act need not contain explicit reasons if the rationale is implicit and reasonable, restoring the cost award set aside by the Single Judge.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(8) Arbitral costs Reasoned award

Balkrishan Barnabas & Anr. v. UOI & Ors.

02 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5202-DB

The Delhi High Court held that promotions granted before the merger of posts must be ignored for ACP benefits, entitling petitioners to first ACP with retrospective effect.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression ACP scheme merger of posts promotion

Grinvo Private Limited and Ors. v. Micro Precession Pvt. Ltd.

02 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5175-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte injunction restraining use of a corporate name due to lack of pleadings and allowed the appellants to challenge the injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte injunction commercial suit Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Kunal Jain v. DY. Labour Commissioner & Anr

02 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:5257

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the order directing payment of wages and compensation, affirming the existence of an employer-employee relationship based on uncontroverted evidence.

labor petition_dismissed employer-employee relationship Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954 writ petition under Article 226 judicial review

Nirupati Charan Sahoo v. Union of India and Others

02 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5228-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the DG, ITBP to decide the petitioner's pending representation within two weeks, ensuring timely administrative action.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition representation administrative delay reasonable time

Gagandeep Kaur v. Rattandeep Singh Grover

02 Jul 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:5260
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging ownership of properties allegedly held benami cannot be summarily dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when disputed factual issues and exceptions under the Benami Act exist, directing the suit to proceed to trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 cause of action fiduciary capacity

Bir Sen Rathi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

02 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025 SCC Online Del 649
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal to determine the rate of interest on retiral dues in accordance with the Full Bench’s decision while upholding the period for which interest is payable.

administrative appeal_dismissed Procedural retiral benefits interest on retiral dues Central Administrative Tribunal rate of interest

Gaurav Rajgaria v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited

02 Jul 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:5253
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an employment contract with an express termination clause is determinable and not specifically enforceable, rejecting the plaintiff's suit for reinstatement and excessive damages for wrongful termination.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant determinable contract specific performance termination clause Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-7 v. M/S Thomson Press (India) Ltd

02 Jul 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5141-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that capital gains addition under Section 50C cannot be made based on a circle rate increased after the date of a registered agreement to sell executed at the earlier rate.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50C Income Tax Act, 1961 circle rate capital gains

M/S INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICE PVT. LTD. v. THE ASSESSING OFFICER, CIRCLE 10(1) & ANR

02 Jul 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5156-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an order reopening income tax assessment for exceeding the scope of the notice under Section 148A(b), emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements in reopening proceedings.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(b) Reopening of assessment

Pradeep Kumar Lathar v. Advance Surfactants India Ltd. & Ors.

02 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathanshankar · 2025:DHC:5246-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of an auction sale under the SARFAESI Act due to mandatory procedural violations and selective relaxation of conditions violating Article 14.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act auction earnest money deposit Article 14