Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sanjeet Gahlot v. Arun Goel

03 Dec 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:9350

The Delhi High Court held the DDA guilty of wilful contempt for failing to comply with its order to include the petitioner in the next land allotment draw within three months, emphasizing that internal policy cannot override Court directions.

administrative contempt_found Significant contempt of court land allotment Delhi Development Authority alternative plot

Saiful Khan v. State

03 Dec 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:9378
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's pre-arrest bail plea in a serious sexual exploitation case involving a minor, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and thorough investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail sexual exploitation minor blackmail

CIT v. M/S. Birlasoft Ltd

03 Dec 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9318-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld that a newly established software unit with fresh capital and separate operations qualifies for deduction under Section 10A, and transfer pricing adjustments must consider the enterprise as a whole rather than individual units.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 10A Income Tax Act new industrial undertaking transfer pricing arm's length price

Kamla Ajmera v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax

03 Dec 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9342-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act applies only to investment in one residential house, and two separate flats on different floors cannot be treated as a single residential house for capital gains exemption.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 54F Income Tax Act capital gains exemption residential house multiple flats

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Arti & Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10196

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award granting compensation for death caused by a DTC bus, rejecting the Insurance Company's challenge based on FIR discrepancies and delay in registration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 FIR discrepancy eyewitness testimony compensation

Sh. Vijay Dev Dabas v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Dec 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:9601

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 193/199 IPC for non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Sections 195 and 340 CrPC, emphasizing that prosecution for such offences requires a court's written complaint.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC Section 340 CrPC Sections 193 and 199 IPC non-cognizable offences

Wahabuddin & Ors. v. Riyazuddin & Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:9691
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of tenants' leave to defend eviction, holding that ownership disputes cannot be adjudicated in eviction proceedings and unregistered documents cannot transfer title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction proceedings landlord-tenant relationship unregistered documents

Garima v. State & Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:9580

The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted under the SC/ST Act, holding that representation of the complainant by counsel satisfies the victim's right to be heard, and procedural irregularity alone does not justify cancellation of bail.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail SC/ST Act procedural fairness victim's right to be heard

Constable Vijay Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:9356-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court dismissed as premature a writ petition challenging Court of Inquiry findings and a Show Cause Notice on physical unfitness, directing the authority to consider the petitioner’s representation and pass a reasoned order.

administrative petition_dismissed Court of Inquiry Show Cause Notice Physical unfitness Disability pension

Dr Vinod Kumari v. Sashastra Seema Bal

03 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:9354-DB

Delhi High Court granted a limited extension of transfer posting for a single mother until her daughter's academic year ends, emphasizing exceptional circumstances and denying any equity or right from the extension.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transfer order single mother academic session judicial interference

Rana Mandal v. Union of India

03 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:9417-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging medical fitness in recruitment for lack of territorial jurisdiction, upholding the binding nature of jurisdictional clauses in recruitment advertisements.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction recruitment advertisement physical standard test medical fitness report

Hemant Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:9449-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim for immediate promotion in CRPF, holding that promotion must follow seniority and vacancy rules amid administrative restructuring.

administrative petition_dismissed promotion seniority Armourer Upgradation Course Head Constable Armourer

Arjun Bapari v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:9371-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF constable for obtaining appointment through a forged certificate, affirming the Commandant's authority to dismiss and rejecting claims of discrimination.

administrative petition_dismissed Border Security Force Act, 1968 BSF Rules, 1969 Appointing Authority Dismissal from service

Sanjay Singhal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 15, Delhi

03 Dec 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9393-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued beyond the statutory limitation period under the Income Tax Act, 1961 without valid findings under Section 150 are invalid and set aside the impugned notices and order.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149 limitation Section 150 non-obstante clause

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Delhi v. UK Paints India Pvt. Ltd.

03 Dec 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9362-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D for disallowance under Section 14A, and without such satisfaction, disallowance cannot exceed the amount claimed by the assessee.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act Rule 8D Income Tax Rules disallowance of expenditure exempt income

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd v. Dharmu Saroj & Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9491

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Insurance Company's appeal challenging negligence and involvement in a fatal motor accident, while enhancing compensation to the Claimants considering dependency and loss of consortium.

motor_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 FIR delay Eyewitness testimony Negligence

Santosh Arora v. Sunil Dhupar and Another

03 Dec 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:9480

The Delhi High Court limited the trial in an eviction petition to the issue of bona fide need, holding that ownership admitted by tenants narrows the dispute to landlord's genuine personal requirement.

civil other Significant eviction petition bona fide need family settlement agreement ownership

Shivam v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

03 Dec 2024 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2024:DHC:9424

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant due to failure to cross-examine key witnesses, inconsistencies in the victim's statements, and defective recording of the accused's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C., thereby upholding the accused's right to a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 313 Cr.P.C. Cross-examination Right to fair trial

Mahesh Chander Kalra v. Bank of India & Ors

03 Dec 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:9344-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the disciplinary dismissal of a bank officer, holding that procedural irregularities did not vitiate the inquiry absent demonstrated prejudice and that judicial review does not permit reappraisal of evidence.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry Regulation 6(17) principles of natural justice judicial review

Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Dec 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:9343-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an adverse advance ruling and held that services provided by the petitioner under a government project are exempt from service tax under the Mega Exemption Notification, affirming the principle that sub-contractors to exempt contractors are also exempt and condemning discriminatory tax treatment violating Article 14.

tax appeal_allowed Significant service tax exemption Mega Exemption Notification works contract Government services