Delhi High Court
61,224 judgments
ASF INSIGNIA SEZ P. LTD v. PUNJ LLOYD LTD
The Delhi High Court granted an extension of time under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable the Arbitrator to consider the petitioner's application for amendment of the claim petition.
Jitendra Kumar Chopra v. Shiv Saran & Sons HUF
The Delhi High Court modified the Arbitral Tribunal's restraint order by allowing sale of property subject to furnishing security to protect the respondent's claims under Section 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Delhi Nagrik Sehkari Bank Members Association v. Registrar of Co Operative Societies
The Delhi High Court directed verification of co-operative bank members with deficient KYC rejected, appointed an independent Observer to oversee Executive Committee elections, and restricted voting to verified members to ensure free and fair elections.
Rishi & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 506, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. subject to payment of costs.
Gaurav Gurnani v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Ravi Nath Sharma v. Jagdish Prasad Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed eviction under Section 14(1)(h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that limitation does not bar the petition and a co-owner can seek eviction when the tenant has acquired alternate residence and is abusing tenancy protections.
Prem Lata & Ors. v. Kuwar Pal (Deceased) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to recall a witness and grant interrogatories in a long-pending eviction case, emphasizing that delay and neglect justify denial of such relief to prevent further delay.
Ankur Chhibber v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions as infructuous after orders granting second financial upgradation were passed but directed the respondents to issue revised PPOs expeditiously.
M/S KHANNA MALLEABLE & ORS. v. M/S PARAS PETRO PLAST INDIA (P) LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for recovery of payment for oil supplied, holding that Delhi courts had territorial jurisdiction and the buyer was liable under Section 42 of the Sale of Goods Act for accepting and using the goods without rejection.
AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS INDIA LTD v. A A NAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant a final opportunity to file a belated written statement with costs, balancing procedural discipline with substantive justice and preserving the pending arbitration application.
Mahesh v. Sawitar Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal's finding that the appellant was the negligent driver causing the accident and held him and the vehicle owner jointly liable for compensation, dismissing the appeal despite the appellant's criminal acquittal.
Rajendra Kumar Patel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to the actual interest accrued on seized funds invested by the respondent and interest on delayed payment, overruling the respondent's claim of liability limited to 6% interest under the Rules.