Ankur Chhibber v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 25 Aug 2017 · 2017:DHC:8501-DB
Sanjiv Khanna; Navin Chawla
W.P.(C) 2704/2017
2017:DHC:8501-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions as infructuous after orders granting second financial upgradation were passed but directed the respondents to issue revised PPOs expeditiously.

Full Text
Translation output
T
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
, t-W.P.(C) 2704/2017 SHRICHAJ® ..... Petitioner
Thrpu^ Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate.;
VERSUS
. mnON OF I>piA & ORS.
Through Mr. Vikram Jaitley, Advocate.
W.P.(C)2718/2017 , . /; -
BIRBAL RAM .;... P'etitioner ') Through Mr. RuchirRanjan Rai, Advocate.
VERSUS
^ •
UNION OF INDIA &QRS. . \ . ...'i.,Respondent
'; Through • Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Advocate.
CORAM: . •••-.•
HOl^'BLE MR,JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
25.08.2017 /....Respondent;
Counsel for the petitipner subniits' tliat ,orders with regard to grant of second financial upgradation .with effect from 199.9 haye been passed. Itis accordmgly stated that the, writ petition has.become infructuous. ' , ' ' . ; , . /
Counsel;for the petitioner, however, state<|that the respondents have nptyetimplemented the orders and PPOs have notbeen issued.
In, view ofthe statement made, the writ;petition is disposed of as infructuous.' . ' the respondents would issue, revised -PPOs in terms of the
•; •
2017:DHC:8501-DB -V- orders ,passed expeditiously and preferably within two months from the date a copy ofthis order is received. No
AUGUST 25,2017 NA, ' ?- -11 SANJWKHANNA,J.
NAVINCHAWLA, J.
2017:DHC:8501-DB
JUDGMENT