Delhi High Court

61,224 judgments

Year:

Union of India and Anr. v. Nitish Kumar

28 Aug 2017 · Vipin Sanghi; Rekha Palli · 2017:DHC:4863-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition, holding that failure to tick the subject column in the examination answer book is inconsequential if the candidate has otherwise clearly provided all relevant particulars.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant examination answer book procedural omission tick mark subject column

S V Sharma v. Director of Education & Ors.

28 Aug 2017 · Vipin Sanghi; Rekha Palli · 2017:DHC:4865-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside disciplinary removal of an employee due to bias arising from a committee member acting as both witness and adjudicator, directing reinstatement without back wages but denying a fresh inquiry given the long delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant natural justice bias disciplinary proceedings departmental inquiry

Triumphant Institute of Management Education Pvt Ltd v. WWW.Timeseducation.co & Ors

28 Aug 2017 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:4845

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to implead 'Think and Learn Pvt. Ltd. (Byju's)' as a necessary party in a domain name and trademark infringement suit based on prima facie association through a telephone number linked to the disputed domain.

civil appeal_allowed domain name dispute trademark infringement impleadment amendment of plaint

Anupam Bali v. The State & Anr

28 Aug 2017 · Vinod Goel · 2017:DHC:4890
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D and 341 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 354D IPC mediation

Akbar & Anr v. The State & Anr

28 Aug 2017 · Vinod Goel · 2017:DHC:4888

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 354, 323, and 506 IPC following an amicable mediation settlement and compounding of offences under Sections 323 and 509 IPC.

criminal petition_allowed compounding offences Section 323 IPC Section 509 IPC mediation settlement

Ravindra Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

28 Aug 2017 · Vipin Sanghi; Rekha Palli · 2017:DHC:4864-DB

The Delhi High Court held that OBC departmental candidates are entitled to 3 years age relaxation over the departmental age limit and directed the petitioner to be considered for appointment accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant age relaxation OBC candidates departmental candidates Delhi Fire Service

Devkala Devi & Ors. v. Union of India

28 Aug 2017 · J.R. Midha · 2017:DHC:4862

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger and died by being run over by a train, not by accidental fall.

civil appeal_dismissed Railway Claims Tribunal compensation claim bona fide passenger accidental fall

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Rita Verma & Ors.

28 Aug 2017 · J.R. Midha · 2017:DHC:4861

The Delhi High Court upheld the Claims Tribunal's motor accident compensation award, affirming income proof via Income Tax returns, addition of future prospects, and rejecting contributory negligence.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim compensation income tax returns future prospects

Kavita Kapoor v. Nitishree Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

28 Aug 2017 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:4850

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from delayed possession of a residential plot, subject to the arbitrator's disclosures under Section 12.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12 appointment of arbitrator

Vinod Bala Dua v. Nitishree Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

28 Aug 2017 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:4844

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a delayed residential plot allotment, with the arbitrator required to comply with disclosure obligations under Section 12.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12 appointment of arbitrator

Mahendra Chugh v. Nitishree Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Now Known As Shouryapuram Towers Pvt. Ltd.

28 Aug 2017 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:4843

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes arising from a delayed possession of a residential plot, as per the arbitration agreement between the parties.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12 appointment of arbitrator

M/S KIRAN SHOES MANUFACTURERS v. NARINDER KOHLI & ANR

28 Aug 2017 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:4846

The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit on the basis of a lawful settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, accepting damages and undertakings from the defendants and granting the plaintiff a refund of half the court fee.

civil appeal_allowed Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC trademark infringement settlement compromise decree

Ram Kumar @ Ajay & Others v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

28 Aug 2017 · Vinod Goel · 2017:DHC:4873

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Arun Pal Yadav v. The State & Anr

28 Aug 2017 · Vinod Goel · 2017:DHC:4872

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of complaint in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Article 226 Section 498A IPC domestic violence

Hari Om & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

28 Aug 2017 · Vinod Goel · 2017:DHC:4870

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement between the married parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute

Pawan Mittal & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

28 Aug 2017 · Vinod Goel · 2017:DHC:4869

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of related civil petitions, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Article 226 Constitution matrimonial dispute

Pawan Mittal & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr

28 Aug 2017 · Vinod Goel · 2017:DHC:4868

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual withdrawal of related civil petitions, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Article 226 & 227 and Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC Section 482 CrPC

Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Shri Chand Sharma & Ors.

28 Aug 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:4882

The Delhi High Court held that a person riding a borrowed vehicle with the owner's consent is not a third party under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and thus the insurer is not liable to pay compensation under the third party insurance policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163-A no-fault liability third party insurance

MCF FINLEASE PRIVATE LIMITED v. PUSHPA PAL

28 Aug 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:4874

The Delhi High Court upheld the liability of the registered owner for compensation in a motor accident claim despite the owner's claim of prior sale without intimation to the registering authority, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim registered owner liability intimation of sale driving licence

POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED v. JV OF XIAN ELECTRIC ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED

28 Aug 2017 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:4847

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 27 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 directing summons to witnesses to appear before the Arbitral Tribunal and produce documents as permitted by the Tribunal.

arbitration petition_allowed Section 27 Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 summoning witnesses Arbitral Tribunal production of documents