Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Rajinder Kumar Modi
The Delhi High Court upheld that failure to opt out of the CPF scheme under the 1992 Office Order results in automatic switching to the Pension Scheme, entitling the employee to pension benefits.
Rekha Gupta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of petitioners' claim for alternative residential plots upon submission of new mutation evidence, emphasizing procedural fairness without deciding on merits.
DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED v. SMART LABORATORIES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court granted interlocutory injunction to the plaintiff against the defendant's use of the deceptively similar trademark AZIWAKE, holding that urgent interim relief was justified and pre-institution mediation was not required under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act.
Krishan Kumar Sethi v. Commissioner of Income Tax-XX & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the addition of unexplained cash deposits as income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the appellant's explanation of advances from prospective buyers as a sham.
Jaya Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and deleted the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act by holding that a plausible explanation of cash deposit from earlier withdrawn cash must be accepted unless disproved.
Shyama Pahwa v. Narendra Pratap Bhalla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit instituted by a next friend on behalf of a plaintiff alleged to be of unsound mind is not maintainable without a mandatory Court inquiry under Order XXXII Rule 15 CPC, and the suit was dismissed following the plaintiff's death before such inquiry.
EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PVT. LTD. v. ST. JOSEPH KINDERGARDEN & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a dispute arising under an agreement containing an arbitration clause empowering the petitioner to appoint the arbitrator.
Aksh Vardhan v. Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed issuance of a detailed Experience Certificate and extension of joining time to enable the petitioner to join the bank as per recruitment requirements.
Sushenmohan Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing removal of directors' disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 upon compliance with the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.
Rajesh v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction for murder due to insufficient and defective circumstantial evidence and investigative lapses.
Union of India v. Ram Singh Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting contract nurses basic pay and DA at par with regular nurses, deferring other allowances pending Supreme Court decision.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Anil Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the MCD's appeal, upholding the Industrial Tribunal's award directing regularisation of muster roll Malis based on binding admissions by the employer's witness and established principles limiting writ court interference.
Triad India & Anr. v. Tribal Cooperative Marketing & Development Federation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as inserted by the 2015 Amendment, does not apply to arbitral proceedings commenced before the amendment, upholding the validity of the arbitral award despite the arbitrator's relationship with the respondent.
Shri Ramvir Giri and Ors. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's order rejecting regularisation of Chowkidars for failure to consider relevant documents and remanded the matter for fresh expeditious adjudication.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences v. Gopal Chandra Sahoo
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of disciplinary proceedings against an AIIMS employee due to lack of credible evidence, emphasizing that charges must be proved on a preponderance of probability with credible corroboration.
Narender Kumar Jain v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a petitioner acting as a mere carrier of corrupt money in a political conspiracy case, imposing conditions to ensure investigation cooperation.
Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited v. Union of India; Bard Healthcare India Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that NPPA cannot freeze prices of non-scheduled formulations beyond Para 20’s mechanism and interest on overcharge is payable only from default in payment, quashing demand notices for overcharging and interest levied from date of overpricing.
Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited v. Union of India; Bard Healthcare India Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that NPPA's interpretation of Para 20 of DPCO 2013 imposing price freezes and interest from overcharging date is incorrect, affirming manufacturers' right to periodic price increases and limiting interest to default in payment.
Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited v. Union of India; Bard Healthcare India Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that NPPA cannot deny manufacturers the right to periodic 10% MRP increases after overcharging violations under Para 20 of DPCO 2013, and interest under Section 7A of the Essential Commodities Act is payable only from default in payment, not from the date of overcharging.
Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha & Anr. v. M/S Arora Stationers & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application, holding that their registered ball point pen design lacked substantial novelty and originality required for protection under the Designs Act, 2000.