Delhi High Court

58,912 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7619-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's rulings allowing deductions under Section 43B for various payments, clarified the onus under Section 14A lies on Revenue, and rejected Revenue's appeal except on the MODVAT credit issue.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 43B Income Tax Act Section 14A Income Tax Act MODVAT credit customs duty

Sushant Kumar Dass v. State

07 Dec 2017 · Mukta Gupta · 2017:DHC:7658

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence for attempt to murder under Sections 452 and 307 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite the appellant's challenge to the reliability of prosecution witnesses and weapon classification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 307 IPC Section 452 IPC Attempt to murder Grievous injury

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7625-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's deletion of Custom Duty addition under section 43B of the Income Tax Act for components imported and used for export.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 43B Custom Duty Import of components

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7624-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions relating to custom duty and sales tax subsidy, ruling in favor of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Appellate Tribunal custom duty sales tax subsidy revenue receipt

Jai Prakash v. Shiv Steel & Anr

06 Dec 2017 · Siddharth Mridul; Deepa Sharma · 2017:DHC:9076-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and condonation application, holding that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient cause for non-appearance and delay in seeking restoration of a writ petition dismissed in default.

civil appeal_dismissed restoration of writ petition condonation of delay dismissal in default Limitation Act 1963

Balaji International v. Thukral Steel Corporation

06 Dec 2017 · Najmi Waziri · 2017:DHC:8312

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions in cheque bounce cases, setting aside convictions upon full payment and compounding the offence with costs as per Supreme Court guidelines.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cheque dishonour compounding of offence Negotiable Instruments Act Damodar S Prabhu

Yogesh Sharma & Ors v. State & Ors

06 Dec 2017 · A.K. Pathak · 2017:DHC:8268

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from landlord-tenant disputes based on an amicable settlement and the complainants' unwillingness to proceed, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement landlord-tenant dispute

ATC Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited v. Reliance Communications Limited & Anr.

06 Dec 2017 · Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:7574

The Delhi High Court held that under the Scheme of Arrangement, the transferee company is prima facie liable to secure the petitioner's outstanding dues arising from transferred telecom infrastructure contracts and granted interim relief accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant Scheme of Arrangement Sections 391-394 Companies Act, 1956 Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Master Services Agreement

New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nishant Parveen & Ors.

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7569
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by relying on unchallenged income tax returns and applying Supreme Court guidelines on future prospects and non-pecuniary damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of income future prospects income tax returns

New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nishant Parveen & Ors.

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7568
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by relying on unchallenged income tax returns and applying Supreme Court guidelines on future prospects and non-pecuniary damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of income future prospects income tax returns

Shivam Goyal v. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7565

The Delhi High Court directed issuance of a No Objection Certificate to an employee seeking early release upon deposit of indemnity as per the service agreement.

employment petition_allowed No Objection Certificate Service Agreement Employment Bond Indemnity Clause

Amit Chhikara v. Union of India and Ors.

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7564

The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to decide on the petitioner’s reply to a Show-cause Notice within a stipulated time, following Supreme Court-affirmed precedent quashing similar notices.

administrative other Significant Show-cause Notice Staff Selection Commission appointment judicial precedent

Vivek Kumar v. Staff Selection Commission & Ors.

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7563

The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to reconsider the petitioner's debarment order in light of a binding Division Bench decision affirmed by the Supreme Court.

administrative other Significant Staff Selection Commission unfair means debarment post-examination analysis

Hitender Ajay Kumar Vikrant Nishant v. Union of India

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7562

The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to withdraw Show-cause Notices issued for alleged unfair means in recruitment exams following binding precedent affirmed by the Supreme Court, or else provide reasons for continuing proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show-cause Notice unfair means Food Corporation of India Examination Staff Selection Commission

Hitender Ajay Kumar Vikrant Nishant v. Union of India

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7561

The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to withdraw Show-cause Notices issued for alleged unfair means in FCI recruitment exams following binding Supreme Court-affirmed precedent, ensuring procedural fairness.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show-cause Notice unfair means Food Corporation of India Examination Staff Selection Commission

Hitender Ajay Kumar Vikrant Nishant v. Union of India

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7566

The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to withdraw Show-cause Notices issued for alleged unfair means in recruitment exams following a Supreme Court-affirmed precedent, or else provide reasons for proceeding further.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show-cause Notice unfair means Food Corporation of India Examination Staff Selection Commission

Hitender Ajay Kumar Vikrant Nishant v. Union of India

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7567

The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to withdraw Show-cause Notices issued for alleged unfair means in recruitment exams following binding precedents affirmed by the Supreme Court or provide reasons for proceeding further.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show-cause Notice unfair means Food Corporation of India Examination Staff Selection Commission

Chandra Prakash Pandey v. Food Corporation of India & Ors.

06 Dec 2017 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2017:DHC:7596-DB

The Delhi High Court directed strict enforcement of vehicle loading limits under the Motor Vehicles Act and Central Motor Vehicles Rules, dismissing the public interest petition after noting compliance efforts by the Food Corporation of India and Transport Department.

administrative petition_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Rule 90(7) Section 113

Qamar Waheed Naqvi v. Independent News Services Pvt Ltd & Anr.

06 Dec 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:7594

The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory orders in arbitration proceedings, such as condonation of delay, are not subject to judicial review before the final award, dismissing the writ petition as not maintainable.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant arbitration interlocutory orders condonation of delay judicial intervention

MAJA COSMETICS & ANR. v. OASIS COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD.

06 Dec 2017 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2017:DHC:7606

The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing written statement beyond 120 days in commercial suits cannot be condoned, upheld the maintainability of Chamber Appeals under Delhi High Court Rules, and granted permanent injunction for trademark infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Order VIII CPC Commercial Courts Act Chamber Appeal