Delhi High Court
64,846 judgments
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Jagbir Kaur
The Delhi High Court set aside a motor accident compensation award for lack of cross-examination of key income evidence and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Jagbir Kaur
The Delhi High Court set aside a motor accident compensation award due to procedural irregularities and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication ensuring adherence to natural justice.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rukmani Devi
The Delhi High Court recalculated and enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying correct principles on income calculation, dependency, and non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rukmani Devi
The Delhi High Court modified the motor accident compensation award by recalculating loss of dependency with proper deductions and additions, clarifying the treatment of dependents and non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Promila Prabhakar
The Delhi High Court set aside the MACT award holding that insurer liability depends on ownership and control of the vehicle at the time of accident and remitted the claim for fresh adjudication.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Promila Prabhakar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the compensation award in a motor accident claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on insurer's liability and compensation, emphasizing the need to determine control and ownership at the accident time.
M/S XS PRODUCTIONS INDIA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Ministry of Tourism's decision to allow a consortium to participate and be awarded a contract, holding that tender conditions did not explicitly bar such associations and judicial review is limited to checking for arbitrariness.
Ajab Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court within five years of the award, and mere deposit in government treasury does not constitute payment.
Gajinder v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to the landowner nor deposited in court, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
Lotus Green LLP v. Renowned Buildtech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the "Lotus" prefix in real estate projects, affirming trademark infringement and territorial jurisdiction based on the plaintiff's registered composite marks and website accessibility.
Naresh Kumar Jain v. Lallan Shah
The High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's rejection of leave to defend in a cheque bounce recovery suit, holding the appellant's defense as implausible and inconsistent.
Sunil Kumar Chhilar v. Navyug School Education Society
The Delhi High Court set aside the summary dismissal of objections to a seniority list on delay grounds, directing reconsideration with a speaking order and personal hearing.
Kanury v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner additional time to supplement his reply and directed the disciplinary authority to consider it before passing any penalty order in a departmental inquiry.
Shri Hanuman Mandir Committee v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to decide and communicate the outcome of the petitioners' pending Representation within a stipulated timeframe, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Gaurav Kindra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by applying Supreme Court guidelines to reduce future prospects addition to 40% and increase personal expenses deduction to 50%, thereby reducing the total compensation payable.
Balraj Parashar v. Union Academy Sr. Sec. School
The Delhi High Court held that age relaxation for appointment as Librarian is not applicable under the Teachers’ circular and that no deemed approval arises under Rule 98 where explicit approval under Rule 97 is required, dismissing the petitioner’s writ petition.
Synergy Measurement Technologies (P) Ltd & Anr. v. SRB Instruments Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional disputes regarding claims beyond the original suit in arbitration are to be decided by the arbitrator, not the court under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act.
Balraj v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, allowing the petitioner's claim for lapse of acquisition and directing payment of compensation.
Balraj v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, directing payment of compensation to the petitioner while leaving title issues open.
Abdul Wahab v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings as compensation had been paid and possession taken, directing release of enhanced compensation if not yet paid.