Delhi High Court
64,846 judgments
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Pooja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation awards by including service allowances in loss of dependency, reducing non-pecuniary damages per Supreme Court guidelines, lowering interest rate to 9%, and setting aside unjustified counsel fee directions.
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Sarita Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced non-pecuniary damages and set aside counsel fees in a motor accident claim, while upholding insurer liability as the deceased was not a gratuitous passenger.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Parmanand (Deceased) Through LRs & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the municipal corporation’s petition to admit relevant documents belatedly in a civil suit concerning public land, emphasizing public interest and fair trial rights.
Kadam Singh v. Tulsi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that after remand, the trial court must pass a fresh judgment on the entire civil suit and remanded the matter for appropriate adjudication, while dismissing the belated appeal for lack of condonation of delay.
Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Lata & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing future prospects enhancement to 25% and adjusting non-pecuniary damages in line with the Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi ruling.
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Pooja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified compensation awards in motor accident claims by including service allowances in loss of dependency, reducing non-pecuniary damages per Supreme Court precedent, and fixing interest at nine percent per annum.
Paramjit Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-possession and non-payment of compensation, relying on Supreme Court precedent and statutory provisions.
ABBOTT HEALTHCARE PVT LTD v. RAJ KUMAR PRASAD & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, a stay of trademark infringement suit requires framing an issue on invalidity and timely initiation of rectification proceedings, and dismissed the plaintiff's premature stay application.
Satpal v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, and declared the petitioner's land acquisition lapsed entitling him to compensation.
Bhagrati v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, allowing the petitioner's claim despite pending title disputes.
Kalu Ram v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if compensation is not paid or deposited in court, regardless of title disputes.
Kalu Ram v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, allowing the petitioner's claim despite possession having been taken.
Seema Tiwari & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that persons with disabilities have no right to occupy licensed premises after license expiry and that reservation with restricted bidding satisfies statutory mandates for preferential allotment at concessional rates.
Seema Tiwari & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that persons with disabilities have no right to occupy licensed premises beyond license expiry and that reservation with restricted bidding satisfies statutory preferential allotment requirements without mandating fixed concessional rates.
Munna Khan v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a licensee under a limited-term license has no right to retain premises beyond expiry, and upheld the validity of a policy reserving 5% of shops for persons with disabilities, dismissing the petition challenging non-renewal.
Kamlesh Devi v. Shyam Sunder Tyagi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that daughters cannot claim coparcenary rights in agricultural land inherited by their father from their grandfather under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and its 2005 amendment, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction.
Ravi Gopala Krishnan and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to ensure functional and quality LED street lights on public roads and appointed nodal officers for grievance redressal, disposing of the writ petition as the purpose was achieved.
Manjeet Singh & Ors. v. Narjeet Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing the plaintiff to amend the plaint with an alternative plea in a partition suit, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the amendment.
Rahul Mehra v. AG International Logistics India (P.) Ltd. & Anr.
A director's written resignation takes immediate effect without Board acceptance, and failure to file Form 32 does not prevent cessation of directorship under the Companies Act, 1956.
RADEXPO AG v. JAYNA TIME INDUS. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the winding up petition against Jayna Time Indus. Ltd. on the ground of undisputed debt payable in Swiss Francs, appointing a provisional liquidator despite disputes over currency conversion and internal shareholder conflicts.