Delhi High Court

64,846 judgments

Year:

Maharaja Jagat Singh v. Lt. Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh

05 Dec 2017 · S. Ravindra Bhat · 2017:DHC:7527

The Delhi High Court held that only the natural born grandchildren of Gayatri Devi are her legal representatives and heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, setting aside an order that had allowed others to be impleaded.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 legal representatives step-children succession rule of primogeniture

India Awake for Transparency v. Union of India

05 Dec 2017 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:7528-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the procedural framework under Section 124(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 and related Rules for transferring shares with unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund, dismissing the petition for lack of necessity to interfere with alleged non-compliance.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Investor Education and Protection Fund Section 124(6) Companies Act 2013 transfer of shares unpaid dividends

Bhai Sarabjit Sabharwal v. Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors.

05 Dec 2017 · Sanjiv Khanna; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7557-DB

The Delhi High Court held that modification of property rights under a settlement agreement requires clear consent, upholding the appellant's rights over a disputed portion while affirming consented changes to boundary wall construction and bathroom use.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement agreement boundary wall possession property rights

M/S ATV Projects (India) Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Dec 2017 · Sanjiv Khanna; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7518-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 4(b) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003, holding that proceedings pending before BIFR abated on repeal and that the petitioner must seek remedy under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Sick Industrial Companies Act Repeal Act Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 4(b)

Energy Efficiency Services Ltd & Anr v. Shaktisinh Gohil

05 Dec 2017 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2017:DHC:7556

The Delhi High Court vacated an ex parte order restraining publication of alleged defamatory statements concerning public procurement, emphasizing the protection of free speech in matters of public interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte order prior restraint free speech defamation

Varun Aggarwal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

05 Dec 2017 · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2017:DHC:7522

The High Court held that the trial court's order closing the right to examine forensic evidence is interlocutory and not revisable, dismissing the revision petition and refusing interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant interlocutory order Section 397(2) Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. Forensic Science Laboratory report

Sushil Arora v. State

05 Dec 2017 · Sanjiv Khanna · 2017:DHC:7523

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of five appellants for murder and attempt to murder based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence, rejecting some witness testimonies as unreliable but affirming the overall prosecution case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness identification murder attempt to murder Section 302 IPC

Birender Singh Yadav v. CBI

05 Dec 2017 · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2017:DHC:7524

The Delhi High Court held that framing charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act against public servants without prior sanction from the competent authority is illegal and set aside such charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19 sanction Cognizance Public servant prosecution

Jaspal Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

05 Dec 2017 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:7525-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing MCD to allot a 110 sq. mtrs. plot to the appellants at the court-fixed rate with interest, holding that court error in tagging petitions cannot prejudice the appellants.

property appeal_allowed Significant plot allotment Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar writ petition court error

DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD v. MEENU DADEIA@MEENU VARDHAN

05 Dec 2017 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 7050
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's decision that a contractual employee of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi qualifies as a departmental candidate entitled to age relaxation for recruitment purposes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant age relaxation departmental candidate contractual employee Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Alok Bansal & Ors v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Ors

04 Dec 2017 · Indermeet Kaur · 2017:DHC:8640

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' plea to replace internal examiners for re-evaluation of theory papers, holding that no prejudice was shown and the issue was not raised earlier.

administrative petition_dismissed re-examination internal examiners external examiners natural justice

Manoj Kumar Sharma v. Karnail Singh

04 Dec 2017 · Mukta Gupta · 2017:DHC:8597

The High Court set aside the dismissal of a complaint for non-prosecution due to the complainant's absence on one date, emphasizing the need to consider overall diligence and procedural requirements before dismissal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant non-prosecution dismissal of complaint Section 251 Cr.P.C. Section 145(2) NI Act

Rvr technologies ltd. v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization

04 Dec 2017 · Chander Shekhar · 2017:DHC:8579

The Delhi High Court dismissed two writ petitions against the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner as withdrawn on the petitioners' request following the trial court's decision.

administrative other Procedural Employees Provident Fund Organization petition withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn High Court of Delhi

Simran @ Samreen v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Dec 2017 · Mukta Gupta · 2017:DHC:8410

The Delhi High Court dismissed two criminal writ petitions as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request for leave to withdraw.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural withdrawal of petition dismissal as withdrawn petitioners State of NCT of Delhi

Harinder Kaushik v. Union of India and Ors.

04 Dec 2017 · G. S. Sistani; V. Kameswar Rao · 2017:DHC:7485-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court as mandated under the 1894 Act.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 compensation payment possession

Bhoop Singh v. State & Anr

04 Dec 2017 · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2017:DHC:7484

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 NI Act, affirming presumption of notice receipt and rejecting the defence of stolen cheques due to delay and lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Legal demand notice Presumption of service

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Saddam & Ors.

04 Dec 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:7501

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurance company to withdraw its appeal against a motor accident compensation award and directed release of the awarded amount to claimants with refund of statutory deposits upon proof of satisfaction.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim insurance company appeal withdrawal compensation award

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Savita Devi & Ors.

04 Dec 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:7500

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging the validity of the driving licence and upheld the compensation awarded to the claimants, relying on police confirmation and binding precedent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance liability driving licence validity accident claim opportunity to lead evidence

The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Prem Wati & Ors.

04 Dec 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:7499

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal for exemption from liability due to lack of evidence that the driver lacked a valid licence, upholding the motor accident compensation award.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed motor accident claim insurer liability valid driving licence burden of proof

United India Insurance Company Limited v. Vindrawati & Ors.

04 Dec 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:7498

The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation award by excluding non-pecuniary damages that do not survive death, upheld insurer's breach of policy plea due to absence of valid permit, and enhanced interest to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of earning capacity loss of dependency non-pecuniary damages