Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Ranjit Kumar Gupta v. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities and Anr

06 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1584

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to reconsider the petitioner's request for document verification in compliance with disability guidelines, ensuring fair opportunity and adequate notice.

administrative other Significant persons with disabilities document verification reasonable accommodation disability rights

Pushpender Kumar v. Indian Bank

06 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1585

The Delhi High Court held that only the Chairman and Managing Director of a public sector bank can decide compassionate appointments and directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's application accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed compassionate appointment public sector banks competent authority Chairman and Managing Director

Suresh Kumar Kaushik & Ors. v. Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.

06 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1586

The Delhi High Court directed discharged Home-Guards to submit a representation for absorption in government posts and mandated the government to decide it within a fixed timeframe, emphasizing administrative remedy exhaustion.

administrative other Home-Guards absorption Group C and D posts recruitment rules relaxation

Sushil Chauhan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:1592-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings as withdrawn, holding that possession and compensation payment prevent lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

constitutional petition_dismissed land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

DELHI CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE WHOLESALES STORE LIMITED v. M/S K N R INTERNATIONAL AND ANR

06 Mar 2018 · Manmohan · 2018:DHC:1569

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's ex parte suit for recovery of damages and interest against defendants who defaulted on supply contracts and failed to indemnify as per arbitral award and agreements.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 10 CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 ex parte decree indemnity bond

M/S Gulmehar Green Producer Company v. Commissioner under Employees Compensation Act (North-East) Labour Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

06 Mar 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:1568

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an ex-parte compensation award, holding that the petitioner must avail the statutory appeal remedy under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act and cannot bypass it by filing a writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 Section 30 appeal writ jurisdiction Article 226 Constitution of India

Ravinder Kumar v. Director General Indo Tibetan Border Police and Anr

06 Mar 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1566-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a promotion for failure to follow natural justice, directing the respondents to issue a show cause notice and pass a reasoned order thereafter.

administrative petition_allowed Significant natural justice show cause notice promotion cancellation service law

Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India

06 Mar 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1567-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expedited release of funds for the petitioner's daughter's spinal surgery but declined to interfere with his administrative transfer, allowing leave for surgery upon fixation of the surgery date.

administrative petition_allowed release of funds spinal surgery administrative transfer leave for medical treatment

Sanjay Chauhan v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

06 Mar 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:1564

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against the petitioner for cheating and conspiracy based on prima facie material but set aside the charge under Section 468 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed prima facie case framing of charges cheating criminal conspiracy

DOLBY INTERNATIONAL AB & ANR. v. DAS TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

06 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1563

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to amend their pleadings after trial commencement to add a license defense, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act and CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC Commercial Courts Act, 2015 patent infringement

Amit Agarwal v. Religare Securities Ltd.

06 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015 (255) DLT 32

The Delhi High Court held that a suit claiming a balance at the foot of a running account is not maintainable under Order XXXVII CPC and must be tried as an ordinary money recovery suit, setting aside the summary decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit liquidated amount running account

Ashok Nanda v. Mohinder Kumar Sharma & Anr.

06 Mar 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1561

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's rejection of specific performance, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract as required under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act equitable remedy

Mohd. Chaman v. Mohd. Atiqur Rehman

06 Mar 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1560

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that the landlord's bona fide need and better title than the tenant suffice without absolute ownership.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction bona fide requirement

Swatantra Bharat Mills and DCM Silk Mills Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

06 Mar 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1565

The Delhi High Court upheld that multiple industrial units owned by the same company are entitled collectively to only one land retention benefit under Supreme Court environmental orders, dismissing the petition challenging the executing court's order enforcing land surrender.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant land surrender industrial relocation environmental protection Supreme Court orders

Vijay Pal @ Sittu v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

06 Mar 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:1559

The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to the accused subject to conditions preventing trial prejudice and witness intimidation.

criminal bail_granted interim bail medical grounds witness intimidation personal bond

Hasnain Azim v. Afroz Abedin & Ors.

06 Mar 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:1558

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the trial court's closure of the petitioner's right to file a written statement for non-compliance in domestic violence proceedings.

family petition_dismissed Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12 written statement interim maintenance

Bishnu Narayan Singh & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

06 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1557

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to follow the Sandeep Singh judgment and stayed the disqualification of directors of a struck-off company pending compliance with statutory provisions and schemes.

corporate petition_allowed Significant disqualification of directors struck off company Section 248(2) Companies Act 2013 Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Harjeet Kathuria & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

06 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1554

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to apply the precedent in Sandeep Singh to allow petitioners disqualified as directors due to a struck-off company to regularize their status under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act and the Condonation of Delay Scheme.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Director disqualification Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Sandeep Jain & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1555

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to apply prior judicial directives allowing directors of struck-off companies to revive their DINs and remove disqualification under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 248(2) Companies Act 2013 Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 Director disqualification Struck off companies

Manoj Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.

06 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1556

The Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of a director pending compliance with statutory provisions under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, following the precedent set in Sandeep Singh.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018