Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Bal Kishan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to treat a writ petition as a representation, provide a personal hearing, and decide the matter by a reasoned order within twelve weeks, allowing further legal recourse if aggrieved.
Nitin Saxena v. Amit Saxena
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for cancellation of registered release deeds as barred by limitation and lacking cause of action, affirming that limitation runs from the date of execution and non-payment of consideration does not invalidate the transfer.
Maj. (Retd.) Dr. Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Armed Forces Tribunal erred in adjourning a review application sine die due to a similar pending Supreme Court appeal and must decide the matter on existing law without undue delay.
MWO Prasanna Kumar Mohapatra (Retd) v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of service extension in the Armed Forces due to non-compliance with mandatory medical examination requirements despite personal and pandemic-related hardships.
Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider belated representations against recovery of training allowance and restrained recovery pending decision, without expressing opinion on merits.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Hardan Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal in a motor accident claim, revising compensation by adjusting future prospects and loss of consortium while affirming contributory negligence and liability principles.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ombir Singh
The Delhi High Court recalculated compensation for a motor accident victim's family, affirming joint liability of insurance companies and applying enhanced future prospects and appropriate deductions for a deceased homemaker.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. Pooja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the sole negligence of a truck driver who negligently parked his vehicle without warning signals causing a fatal accident, dismissing the insurer's appeal and affirming full compensation to the victim's legal heirs.
HRTC Nalagarh v. Savita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the bus driver was solely negligent in a rear-end collision at a traffic signal, set aside contributory negligence attributed to the deceased Scooty driver, and enhanced the compensation awarded to the claimants.
Naresh Chand v. Roshan Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of objections in execution proceedings, holding that execution courts cannot re-examine the validity of a final possession decree based on a license under a government rehabilitation scheme.
Ashwani Kumar v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a compassionate appointment due to medical unfitness and abolition of the post but allowed the appellant to seek monetary rehabilitation benefits in lieu of employment.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research v. Birender Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's interim orders directing payment of salary to a driver whose transfer was challenged, dismissing the petition against the status quo and salary directives.
Manoj Kumar v. Govt. of NCTD Through the Commissioner of Police and Ors.
The High Court set aside the unreasoned Tribunal order dismissing the petition challenging dismissal for unauthorized absence and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper reasoning.
SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LIMITED v. NARENDER KUMAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and summary judgment in favor of Sun Pharma, restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar mark 'CAFTADAY' for pharmaceutical products, emphasizing higher scrutiny for medicinal trademarks and awarding costs.
Jai Prakash v. Smt. Prem Lata
The Delhi High Court partly allowed a revision petition permitting examination of a handwriting expert at a belated stage while dismissing the application to summon official witnesses, emphasizing relevancy and procedural propriety.
Union of India v. M/S Parishudh Machines Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that interest on an arbitration award continues to accrue until the awarded amount is actually deposited and made available to the decree holder, dismissing the petitioner's claim that mere tendering of cheques stopped interest liability.
Nandan Mukherjee v. Mohd Rafiq and Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by averaging income tax returns, adding future prospects, correcting multiplier, and increasing prosthetic limb and attendant charges while denying loss of consortium claims.
Ayush Verma v. LRS of Beeru Verma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that negligence of the deceased driver was established and remanded the matter for compensation determination under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, allowing the appellant's appeal.
Davinder Goyal & Anr. v. Vikram Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that the driver's own statement established rashness and negligence, and remanded the matter for fresh compensation determination.
Ajit Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a police constable after his exoneration in departmental enquiry on identical charges, holding that continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.