Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
M/S Mieux Homecare Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Yogesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Authority’s order directing payment of earned wages to the employee, dismissing the company’s writ petition challenging the findings and liability under the Delhi Shops & Establishment Act, 1954.
Union of India v. President Films Division Emplyees Union
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award granting enhanced pay to Films Division employees performing Technical Assistant duties, holding the Films Division as an 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act and affirming the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Sunder & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a sexual assault case due to the victim's inconsistent and unreliable testimony, emphasizing the necessity of sterling quality evidence for conviction.
Mohd Tarique Afaque and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Renu Tushir v. V. Kameswar Rao & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking participation in later stages of a recruitment process due to the petitioner’s failure to contact the helpline and delay in raising the grievance after the selection process was complete.
Sudha Dewan v. M/S. JMD Buildcon
The Delhi High Court upheld the decree directing refund of earnest money with interest, holding that time was not of the essence and forfeiture without proof of loss was impermissible under Section 74 of the Contract Act.
Deep Narayan Tiwari @ Deepak v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 506, and 509 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
M/S JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED v. M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
The Delhi High Court restored the original arbitral award including financial costs as mobilization expenditure and interest, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited and does not permit modification of reasonable arbitral findings.
EVERGREEN LAND MARK PVT. LTD. v. JOHN TINSON AND COMPANY PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the lease dispute on the basis of a lawful settlement agreement, holding it binding and terminating prior security arrangements.
Raj Pal Singh v. Urmila Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against the Family Court's order awarding interim maintenance and litigation expenses to the wife, affirming the maintenance amount as fair and reasonable based on the parties' financial status.
Prabhat Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's authority to seize goods of a street vendor vending in a no-vending zone without a Certificate of Vending, dismissing the petition challenging the seizure as illegal.
Manju Yadav @ Richa Yadav v. Rajesh Yadav & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition, holding that belated but bona fide compliance with a settlement order does not constitute willful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Vikash Mishra and Ors. v. The State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under minor IPC offences on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Sameer Arshad Khatlani v. State and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279, 337, and 338 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and compensation paid, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process in a case of unintentional accident without gross negligence.
ABR EMERALD LLP v. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that a higher offer made post-auction by a non-participating party without depositing Earnest Money is not a valid ground to reopen or set aside a court-approved auction in company liquidation proceedings.
Delhi Development Authority v. Ashwani Khurana and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the DDA's appeal challenging the setting aside of a revenue order under the Delhi Land Reforms Act on grounds of delay and laches, leaving substantive issues undecided.
State v. Rocky
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's bail order under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, ruling that interference with bail requires cogent grounds and no such grounds existed here.
Schlumberger Asia Service Ltd. v. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court held that New Delhi is the seat of arbitration and thus has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the respondent's objection based on Dehradun being the seat.
Rahul Kashyap v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging anticipatory bail granted to accused in a minor family dispute under Sections 308 and 34 IPC, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and bail was rightly granted.
Rocky & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.