Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Pritpal Singh v. State

01 May 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3601

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner found with live cartridges, holding that mere unconscious possession without knowledge or intention does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant conscious possession Section 25 Arms Act unconscious possession Section 482 CrPC

Suman Kumar Singh and Ors. v. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd and Anr.

01 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:3593

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a cut-off date fixed for eligibility in a promotion examination circular, holding it consistent with recruitment rules and dismissing the petition challenging it.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination inter-cluster promotion residency period cut-off date

BDR Builders and Developers Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -15, New Delhi

01 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:3459-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the reopening of income tax assessment under Section 147 for failure to fully and truly disclose material facts, rejecting the petitioner’s challenge to the reassessment notice and order.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 147 Income Tax Act reopening of assessment true and full disclosure escaped income

Anil v. Central Information Commission & Ors.

01 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3596

The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's refusal to impose penalty or grant compensation for delay in furnishing RTI information, holding no malafide on part of the CPIO.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 20 RTI Act Compensation for delay Penalty on CPIO

Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board v. Dulari Devi & Anr.

01 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:3436-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of a building worker to pension under the BOCW Act and Rules despite not fulfilling the three-year continuous beneficiary requirement, emphasizing Rule 272 as the governing eligibility criterion.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant BOCW Act 1996 pension eligibility building worker beneficiary

Ravi Kumar Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

01 May 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:3491-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the amendment negating carry-forward of qualified candidates in CRPF departmental promotions, dismissing the petitioners' claim for promotion based on earlier rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant departmental examination promotion carry forward CRPF Establishment Manual

Nirmal Bansal & Anr. v. Shyam Lal Bansal & Anr.

01 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3565
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that plaintiffs inheriting half share via a registered Will have locus standi and are entitled to partition and injunction against defendant's interference in jointly owned property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Partition suit Registered Will Locus standi Oral partition

Amrit Bala Sharma & Anr. v. Commissioner of Police & Anr.

01 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3597

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim for enhanced rent and arrears against the Delhi Police, holding no promise of higher rent existed and the writ petition was not maintainable beyond limitation.

civil petition_dismissed rent fixation promissory estoppel legitimate expectation writ petition

Dr. Subhash Vijayran v. Commissioner of Police

01 May 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:3528-DB

The Delhi High Court directed timely post-mortem by forensic experts and expeditious police response to procedural complaints, while declining to transfer investigation to CBI in a delayed post-mortem case.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant post-mortem examination Standing Orders of Delhi Police delayed post-mortem independent investigation

Kuruvitadam Agencies (P) Ltd v. M/S Sony India (P) Ltd

01 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3561

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to nominate an arbitrator as per the Franchise Agreement arbitration clause.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of Arbitrator Franchise Agreement

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Neelam & Ors.

01 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3568

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal, holding it liable to pay compensation despite the driver’s forged licence due to lack of evidence of owner’s knowledge and insurer’s failure to prove forgery.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driving licence forgery insurance liability owner’s knowledge

M/S Pooja Bangles & Ors. v. M/S Suman Jewellers

01 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3492

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging summons under Section 138 NI Act, holding that a typographical error in the legal notice does not invalidate it and service on the firm through partners is valid.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act legal notice typographical error partnership firm

Sunayana Sibal & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

01 May 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Ms. Justice Manmeet Prita... · 2024:DHC:3527-DB

The Delhi High Court directed strict enforcement against illegal Oxytocin use in dairies and emphasized urgent relocation of dairies near landfill sites to protect animal welfare and public health.

administrative other Significant Oxytocin animal cruelty Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. M/S SATINDER MAHAJAN

01 May 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:3569
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that in absence of an exclusive jurisdiction clause, the court at the seat of arbitration—here, Pathankot—has jurisdiction to entertain challenges to arbitral awards under the MSME Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 MSME Act, 2006 jurisdiction seat of arbitration

T.V. Today Network Limited v. Union of India and Ors.

01 May 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh A... · 2024:DHC:3493-DB

The Delhi High Court held that automated email acknowledgements are not appealable decisions under IT Rules 2021 and directed expeditious adjudication of the petitioners' fresh appeal against Instagram account disabling for repeated IP infringements.

administrative other Significant Instagram account disabling Information Technology Rules 2021 Grievance Officer Grievance Appellate Committee

Amarjeet Gupta v. Election Commission of India & Ors.

01 May 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:3532-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions for immediate communication of political arrests to the Election Commission and virtual campaigning rights for arrested leaders, holding the petition frivolous and beyond the Court's jurisdiction.

constitutional petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation Election Commission of India Model Code of Conduct Arrest of political leaders

Union of India v. Nina Lath Gupta

01 May 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3477-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of a stigmatic termination order of a tenure employee and directed monetary compensation for the unserved tenure period, emphasizing that termination orders founded on allegations require due process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant stigmatic termination tenure appointment opportunity of hearing contractual termination

Pran Nath Chadha & Ors. v. Chetanya Build Con India Private Limited

01 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3546

The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiffs to terminate the redevelopment agreement and restrained the Defendant developer from alienating or interfering with the property due to prolonged delay and loss of trust.

property appeal_allowed Significant Property Development Agreement Redevelopment Termination of Agreement Injunction

Aruna Khera v. Vipin Khera & Kumkum Bhatia

01 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3835

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the second Will dated 12.11.2001, rejecting the challenge to it, and decreed partition of the suit property accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will validity Indian Succession Act Partition suit Constructive possession

M/S GPR POWER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. M/S JAGUAR INTERNATIONAL LTD.

01 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4167-DB

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's decree in a summary suit where the defendant failed to comply with the condition of depositing the entire suit amount as security.

civil appeal_dismissed summary suit Order XXXVII CPC conditional leave to defend security deposit