Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sanjay Kaushik v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

02 May 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:4277

The Delhi High Court held that courts cannot direct FIR registration against investigating officers without due process and must exercise judicial restraint in passing adverse remarks, setting aside such a direction against the petitioner.

criminal petition_allowed Significant judicial restraint investigating officer FIR registration natural justice

Nutan Gaur v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

02 May 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:4062

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a bank employee for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust, holding that mere negligence without dishonest intention does not constitute these offences.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 420 IPC Section 409 IPC criminal breach of trust

Ritz Theatre Private Limited v. Ramesh Chandra

02 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3993

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award holding the termination of a cinema hall employee illegal for non-compliance with statutory retrenchment provisions and dismissed the writ petition challenging the award.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant illegal termination retrenchment Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 25F

National Highways Authority of India v. Guruvayoor Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

02 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3657

The Delhi High Court enforced arbitral interim orders directing strict adherence to escrow agreement terms and secured payment of outstanding negative grant by the Judgment Debtor to NHAI.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 Escrow Agreement Negative Grant

Virendra Singh v. The Manager Haryana Shakti Senior Secondary School & Ors

02 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:3685

The Delhi High Court held that an employee illegally prevented from working is entitled to salary arrears with interest despite non-performance, directing payment for the period of compulsory retirement later set aside.

administrative petition_allowed Significant compulsory retirement salary arrears no work no pay illegal deprivation

Om Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

02 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3520
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving minor offences under IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with conditions to ensure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Sujata Kulshreshtra v. Triveni Media Ltd

02 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3749

The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT in accordance with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

corporate other Significant winding up Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013 Section 434

M/S VANS INC USA v. FATEH CHAND BHANSALI & ANR

02 May 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:3789

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to cancel the 'IVANS' marks, holding that prior honest use, product differentiation, and lack of deceptive similarity preclude cancellation despite the petitioner’s well-known 'VANS' trademark.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 deceptive similarity prior user rights honest concurrent use

M/S VANS INC USA v. FATEH CHAND BHANSALI & ANR

02 May 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:3789

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to cancel the respondent’s trademarks 'IVANS' and 'IV ANS NXT', holding that prior honest use, product differentiation, and lack of likelihood of confusion preclude removal despite the petitioner’s well-known 'VANS' mark.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Trademark infringement Deceptive similarity Honest concurrent user

Union of India v. M/S Mahesh Edible Oil Industries Ltd

02 May 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:3506-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, holding that the petition challenging the arbitral award was barred by limitation and the delay could not be condoned beyond the statutory 30-day period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 limitation condonation of delay Section 14 Limitation Act

Kunwar Divyansh Singh v. Union of India

02 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3518

The Delhi High Court upheld the government's valid policy decision to discontinue reservation for PMRBP awardees in Central Pool medical seats, holding that no legitimate expectation or enforceable right arose from past practice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant legitimate expectation Central Pool MBBS/BDS seats Pradhan Mantri Rashtriya Bal Puraskar reservation

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. v. MR PRABHJOT SINGH DHILLON

02 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3743

The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's order directing the Department of Education to provide information on disciplinary actions against teachers for private tuitions, ruling that difficulty in collating voluminous information is not a valid ground for denial under the RTI Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 disciplinary action private tuitions

Deepak @ Sunny v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

02 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3498

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Gulzar Ahmed & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

02 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3682

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Ador Welding Ltd. & Anr. v. Bansal Weld Pvt. Ltd.

02 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3664

The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition due to bona fide disputes over the claimed debt, directing the petitioner to pursue civil proceedings instead.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding up petition Companies Act 1956 bona fide dispute debt recovery

Suliaman Agha Saihoon v. Narcotics Control Bureau

02 May 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3604

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused under the NDPS Act, holding that Section 37 applies only to commercial quantity personally recovered and emphasizing the need for corroboration of disclosure statements at trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS disclosure statement

Kanhaiya Manjhi and Ors v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors

02 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:3589

Delhi High Court directs NDMC to absorb surplus staff of a closed aided school in its own or aided schools under Rule 47 DSER, protecting their service continuity and salary rights.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Rule 47 DSER 1973 absorption of surplus staff aided schools NDMC

Bunch Microtechnologies Pvt Ltd v. AMCP Edutech Pvt Ltd and Others

02 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3595

The Delhi High Court directed consolidation of all IP and investment disputes between the parties to a sole arbitrator, upheld interim protection of joint venture IP rights, and treated the Section 9 petition as a Section 17 application pending arbitration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Intellectual Property Rights Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition Section 17 application

Millennium Education Management Private Limited v. Narayan Sewa Samiti

02 May 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:3651

The Delhi High Court dismissed the respondent's delayed recall application challenging the appointment of an arbitrator, affirming the validity of the arbitration agreement and emphasizing that contractual disputes fall within the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement recall of order condonation of delay Section 17 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Prachi Jain v. Sunil Kumar Jain

02 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3504

The Delhi High Court set aside the order denying maintenance to a petitioner post-majority and employment, directing the Sessions Court to reconsider her entitlement as an aggrieved person under the DV Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 maintenance aggrieved person Section 482 Cr.P.C.