Delhi High Court

29,971 judgments

Year:

Nidhi Jain v. Ankit Jain

31 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:6270

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal directing the Family Court to summon witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to prove the respondent's concealment of assets for maintenance determination, emphasizing the court's wide discretionary power to ensure justice.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. maintenance proceedings concealment of assets domestic violence

Daulat Ram Brake Mfg Co v. Union of India

31 Jul 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:6296
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to invalid constitution of the arbitral tribunal comprising ineligible railway employees without express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing the necessity of impartiality and party autonomy in arbitrator appointments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Seventh Schedule Arbitral Tribunal constitution

Ansal Housing Limited v. Vikas Jain & Anr.

31 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6375

The Delhi High Court held that the NCDRC must issue notice before modifying an order to ensure procedural fairness, and directed reconsideration of the review application after affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.

civil appeal_allowed Significant National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission review application notice natural justice

Bharat Bhushan Sachdeva & Ors. v. Jhang Biradari Housing Residents Society

31 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6379

The Delhi High Court held that issues involving mixed questions of law and fact cannot be decided as preliminary issues without evidence and upheld the trial court's order directing evidence to be led.

civil petition_dismissed Significant preliminary issues mixed question of law and fact benami transactions limitation

Ecotone Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Preksha Interiors Pvt. Ltd.

31 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6366-DB

The Delhi High Court granted interim exclusive rights to the appellants for the device mark ECOTONE in registered classes while permitting respondents prior use for certain goods, pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark registration device mark ECOTONE prior user rights interim relief

Rita Rikh v. Arvind Gautam

31 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6354-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's frivolous appeal seeking to extend an interim injunction beyond the original prayer, holding that injunctions cannot be modified to grant relief not sought at trial.

civil appeal_dismissed interim injunction passing off trademark Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC

Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India and Others

31 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6367-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective downward revision of pay without notice is unlawful, rejected a post-retirement undertaking waiving legal rights, and directed payment of interest on withheld retiral benefits.

administrative petition_allowed Significant retiral benefits pay fixation natural justice undertaking

Tamta Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Allied Energy System Pvt. Ltd.

31 Jul 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:6389

The Delhi High Court held that delay beyond 30 days after the three-month limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned, dismissing a petition filed 325 days late challenging an arbitral award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 condonation of delay limitation period

Government of India v. Vedanta Limited & Anr.

31 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6355-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals against interim orders passed under Section 151 CPC restraining encashment of bank guarantees are not maintainable under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as they do not fall within the specified categories of appealable orders.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 151 CPC Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 50 Arbitration Act

Directorate of Enforcement v. Sanjeev Kapoor; Directorate of Enforcement v. Anirudh Wadhwa

31 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6548

The Delhi High Court clarified that in PMLA complaint cases, accused are entitled only to documents relied upon at framing of charges, and unrelied documents may be accessed during trial, balancing investigation confidentiality and accused rights.

criminal other Significant Section 207 Cr.P.C. Section 208 Cr.P.C. Prevention of Money Laundering Act supply of documents

Udai Cold Storage and Ice Plant Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

31 Jul 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:6511-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a tender due to the petitioner's abnormally low bid failing to comply with minimum wage requirements and rejected the petitioner's challenge to the cancellation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant abnormally low bid minimum wages tender cancellation statutory compliance

Dr. B. N. Mittal v. Union of India & Anr.

31 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6419-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a tribunal cannot impose penalty or limit pensionary benefits without remand, entitling the deceased officer's heirs to full pension from superannuation despite procedural lapses in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings pensionary benefits principles of natural justice communication of reasons

Rusia v. Shahnaz Perveen

31 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6273-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting contractual teachers salary and emoluments equivalent to regular teachers under the principle of equal pay for equal work, dismissing the MCD's challenge.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant equal pay for equal work contractual teachers 7th Central Pay Commission Dearness Allowance

Union of India & Anr. v. Dilpreet Singh Nagi & Ors.

31 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6278-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that seniority must be fixed from the date of joining service as per the Supreme Court's ruling in K. Meghachandra Singh, dismissing the challenge to the Tribunal's order quashing the seniority list placing direct recruits senior to promotees.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant seniority direct recruits promotees date of joining

Jagdeep v. Staff Selection Commission & Ors.

31 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6297-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the Tribunal's order to declare the petitioner's result without requiring an interview, as the interview was not part of the prescribed selection process.

administrative appeal_allowed Staff Selection Commission Central Administrative Tribunal Interview-cum-Personality Test Recruitment process

Soni E Vehicle Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs ICD Tughlakabad New Delhi

31 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6416-DB

Delhi High Court reduced pre-deposit and directed CESTAT to adjudicate on merits the classification dispute of imported E-Rikshaw components as complete vehicles under the Motor Vehicles Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs classification E-Rikshaw import Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Customs Act 1962

Divya Sood v. Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax & Anr.

31 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6393-DB

Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders and remanded for fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notification open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST Act Section 168A Notification No. 56/2023 Show Cause Notice

Divya Sood v. Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax & Anr.

31 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6394-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file a GST appeal despite challenges to notification validity, pending the Supreme Court's final ruling on the procedural validity of GST extension notifications.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A Central GST Act Notification validity GST Council recommendation Show cause notice

MS Deepanshi & Ors. v. Rehabilitation Council of India & Ors.

31 Jul 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:6415

The Delhi High Court directed ex-post facto approval of the college and registration of petitioners as Rehabilitation Professionals, holding that students should not be penalized for institutional non-approval when they have completed recognized courses and passed exams conducted by the statutory examining body.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992 registration of rehabilitation professionals ex-post facto approval recognized rehabilitation qualification

RAMACIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED

31 Jul 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:6430
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the defendant's application to place additional documents on record in a commercial suit, emphasizing strict adherence to timely disclosure under the Commercial Courts Act while permitting documents obtained shortly before trial to ensure relevance and fairness.

civil other Significant Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC late filing of documents commercial suits Commercial Courts Act 2015