Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Anushi Arora v. Managing Committee Maxfort School Dwarka Sector 7 New Delhi 110075 & Anr

06 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:3768

The Delhi High Court directed payment of arrears of pay and gratuity to a resigned employee as per statutory provisions, allowing a fresh petition on leave encashment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant writ petition terminal benefits resignation 6th Pay Commission

Sandeep Kumar Yadav v. Naresh Kumar Chief Secretary GNCT of Delhi & Ors.

06 May 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3753

The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings cannot question the correctness of a disciplinary order and dismissed the petition alleging non-compliance with its earlier judgment, granting liberty to challenge the order through appropriate legal remedies.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court disciplinary punishment doctrine of proportionality COVID-19 pandemic

State (NCT) of Delhi v. Karan Singh Yadav & Ors.

06 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3613
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that electronic evidence accompanied by a Section 65B certificate filed before trial commencement is admissible, setting aside the discharge of accused and remanding for fresh charge framing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 65B Indian Evidence Act electronic evidence admissibility sting operation evidence Prevention of Corruption Act

Ejaz Haider Zaidi & Ors. v. CA Co-operative T/C Society Ltd.

06 May 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2024:DHC:3683-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal against an arbitral award due to inordinate delay and participation in arbitral proceedings, affirming the borrower's liability to repay the loan.

civil petition_dismissed Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Arbitral award Condonation of delay Notice of arbitral proceedings

Bharat Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics

06 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3618
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case based on co-accused disclosures and evidence of involvement, with the court holding that such statements can be considered at bail stage despite Toofan Singh ruling.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail NDPS Act Section 67 NDPS Section 37 NDPS

Sudesh Chhikara v. District Magistrate West Delhi and Anr.

06 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3675

The Delhi High Court held that authorities under the Senior Citizens Act have jurisdiction to decide eviction on harassment grounds despite pending title disputes, but must conduct independent inquiry before passing orders.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 eviction jurisdiction title dispute

Mahender Shah v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

06 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3619

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that Section 50 is not applicable to recovery from a bag, and procedural delays in sampling do not vitiate prosecution absent tampering.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Section 52A NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act search and seizure

Uttam Samadder v. The Union of India

06 May 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:3634-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a BSF personnel who voluntarily resigns before completing 20 years of qualifying service is not entitled to pensionary benefits under the CCS Pension Rules, 1972.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant BSF Rules 1969 CCS Pension Rules 1972 voluntary resignation pensionary benefits

Rohit Shukla; Vivek Kumar Gaurav; Shawez Chaudhary; A. Solanki v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3737
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s discharge of the accused in a rape case, holding no prima facie case was made out as the petitioner’s consent was voluntary and not vitiated by fraud.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant discharge of accused prima facie case Section 376 IPC consent and fraud

Pradeep Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

06 May 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:3681-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of a Health Trade License and demolition of a food cart, holding that compensation claims involving disputed facts must be pursued via civil suits, not writ petitions.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ jurisdiction monetary compensation health trade license municipal corporation

ACME Heergarh Powertech Private Limited v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

06 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3615-DB

The Delhi High Court held that while solar power generation units fall outside the MOOWR Regulations due to the nature of electricity as a resultant good, the grant and cancellation of Customs licenses are quasi-judicial acts requiring due process, and executive instructions cannot fetter the independent discretion of Customs officers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 151A MOOWR Regulations quasi-judicial function

Anuj v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3627

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in recovery of commercial quantity of ganja, holding that no reasonable grounds existed to believe he was not guilty or unlikely to reoffend under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 37 NDPS Act bail under NDPS Act commercial quantity narcotics Section 439 CrPC

Bhushan Steel and Strips Ltd. v. Tyo Trading Enterprises and Ors.

06 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3734

The Delhi High Court upheld its territorial jurisdiction and decreed recovery against the defendant for loss of goods, affirming substitution of the plaintiff by Tata Steel Ltd. without fresh amendment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction recovery suit substitution of parties transportation liability

Aradhana v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

06 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3699
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside the charge framing order for lack of reasons and remanded the case for fresh consideration to ensure judicial mind is applied at the prima facie stage.

criminal other Significant framing of charge prima facie case Section 227 CrPC Section 228 CrPC

Crystal Crop Protection Limited v. Ranga Krishna Murthy

06 May 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:3628-DB

Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the order returning plaint for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that averments in the plaint must be accepted on demurrer and part of cause of action arose in Delhi.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC territorial jurisdiction cause of action demurrer

Hardeep v. University of Delhi & Ors.

06 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3704

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference in subjective examination marking is generally impermissible absent mala fides or arbitrariness and dismissed the student's challenge to awarded marks.

academic_law petition_dismissed subjective examination judicial review marks awarded examiner discretion

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. MEENAKSHI KHARE AND ORS.

06 May 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MANMOHAN; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2024:DHC:3705-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the re-appointment of employees in a merged school, ruling that valid original appointments under applicable rules cannot be invalidated despite alleged non-compliance with other recruitment criteria.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant appointment validity recruitment rules Delhi School Education Act, 1973 merger of schools

Shayam Sunder v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3611
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a large-scale insurance fraud case, holding that CDR evidence is corroborative and bail cannot be denied solely on the gravity of economic offences or incomplete investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offence cheating forgery

Gaurav v. The State Govt of NCT

06 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3616

Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a murder case considering doubtful evidence, lack of premeditation, and prolonged incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail section 302 IPC culpable homicide exception 4 to section 300 IPC

PTECH INFRA ENGINEERING v. LITE BITE FOODS PVT LTD

06 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3692

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from Work Orders containing a valid arbitration clause.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause