Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Principal Commissioner of Customs v. M/S. Linear Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court held that for determining the monetary threshold for filing appeals under CBIC circulars, only the duty involved is decisive, and dismissed the appeal as the duty was below the prescribed limit.
M/S Wellness Marketing Exi Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of personal hearing.
Chemrow India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity of personal hearing.
M/S POINT FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed tax authorities to decide the petitioner's refund claims under Section 42 of the DVAT Act within four weeks, allowing further legal remedies if dissatisfied.
Mrishi Marcndey India Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato, Department of Trade and Taxes
The Delhi High Court set aside an order dismissing a GST show cause notice for non-response, directing the petitioner be given an opportunity to respond and the matter be re-adjudicated in accordance with law.
Amita Gandoak v. Harkirat Singh Sodhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition, holding that the earlier consent decree is binding and cannot be challenged by an independent suit, and that the plaintiff's claim is barred by limitation, estoppel, and lack of cause of action.
M/S NEWAGE SCAFFOLDINGS PVT. LTD. v. M/S PARAMOUNT INFRAVENTURE PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition due to a bona fide dispute over debt liability, directing the petitioner to pursue civil remedies with liberty to condone delay.
Giridhari Pal v. Vice Chancellor University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing retrospective promotion of a Technical Assistant to Senior Technical Assistant with seniority from 2016, rejecting delay and procedural objections but denying retrospective financial benefits.
State v. Roshan
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a child sexual assault case due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of credible evidence proving kidnapping or assault beyond reasonable doubt.
Nakul Kumar Jain & Ors. v. The Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Luv Chaudhary v. Shruti Agarwal
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross-appeals and a contempt petition by directing detailed custody and visitation arrangements prioritizing the child's welfare and ensuring parental access to school information.
Gymnastics Federation of India v. Padmaja Garikipati and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory stay on election notice, holding that any variation must be sought before the same court and will be decided according to law.
Ali Qureshi and Anr. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in minor offence cases.
Amit Choudhry v. Kawandeep Singh Sampuran
The Delhi High Court held that cross-examination under Section 138 NI Act can be conducted via video conferencing and the respondent cannot withdraw prior consent for virtual examination without valid reasons.
Sanjay Babu Rinku v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC based on subsequent marriage and settlement between parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash serious offences in appropriate cases.
Mulakh Raj Dua v. The State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to consider the petitioner's refund application for stamp duty paid on a voided auction sale, holding that the six-month limitation under Section 54 of the Indian Stamp Act is not absolute and must be reckoned from the date of knowledge of non-use.
Suresh Bhati and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, directing adherence to visitation rights.
Sneh Lata & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under non-heinous IPC sections upon amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC with conditions for social responsibility.
Saraf Paper Mills Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court dissolved M/s. Saraf Paper Mills Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Official Liquidator and permitting transfer of surplus funds after completion of liquidation.
Atamjit Singh & Ors. v. Sports Fit World Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT in light of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Companies Act, 2013 provisions mandating such transfer.