Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
AJ Flight Reservations Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi West and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner’s GST refund claim within two weeks, emphasizing compliance with the statutory 60-day period under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Arvind Sharma v. Superintendent, Range - 115, Central Goods and Service Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction, proper notice, and reasoned order, and set aside the retrospective cancellation in this case.
Smartadmedia v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a delayed GST refund claim within two weeks in accordance with Section 54(7) of the CGST Act and Board Circular guidelines.
M/S L G TRADING HOUSE v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner's GST cancellation application within four weeks, emphasizing timely disposal of such statutory applications.
The Principal Commissioner of Customs, ACC Imports New Delhi v. M/s. Salasar Synthetics
The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against reduction of customs fines and penalties on the ground that the appeal amount was below the prescribed monetary limit for maintainability.
Purvanchal Hathkargha Sahakari Sangh Ltd. v. All India Handloom Fabrics Society and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Registrar has power to appoint an arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, and where the Registrar fails, the Court can appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, with notice to the Registrar sufficing as notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act.
Guala Closures SPA v. AGI Greenpac Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the Defendant's tamper-evident closure does not infringe the Plaintiff's patent due to fundamental structural and functional differences, and refused interim injunction.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S IJM Corporation Berhad
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that provisional extensions of time were not permitted under the contract and dismissed MCD's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
BOSCH LIMITED v. M/S GUPTAJEE ENGINEERS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to set aside abatement of suit against deceased defendant's legal heirs, condoning delay due to COVID-19 and holding that liabilities of a dissolved partnership survive against legal representatives.
Sukra Logistics v. Emu Lines Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Sukra Logistics partnership firm against a decree for recovery of unpaid invoices, holding that failure to file written statement justified decree under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC and unsubstantiated entity distinction claims were rejected.
Delhi Administration v. Raj Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal of a respondent charged with obstructing Food Inspectors, holding that non-compliance with mandatory witness requirements under the PFA Act vitiated prosecution and that appellate interference in acquittal requires compelling reasons.
M/S B.L. Mehta Constructions Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions for appointment of an arbitrator due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the appropriate forum is the High Court of Madhya Pradesh where the cause of action and seat of arbitration lie.
Murari Lal Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a 1992 Summary Court Martial and related orders as barred by limitation and res judicata, upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal’s dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal.
Rakesh Saini v. Sangeeta Saini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s order directing an able-bodied husband to pay ₹4,800 per month interim maintenance to his wife and minor child, affirming income assessment based on minimum wages and legal duty to maintain dependents.
Chief Engineer (Electrical) CPWD v. Rakesh Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award setting aside wrongful termination due to flawed inquiry violating natural justice and directed reinstatement with 50% back wages, emphasizing limited judicial interference in disciplinary matters.
Delhi Industrial Corporation v. National Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the suit for recovery of an insurance claim to proceed after failed pre-institution mediation due to the insurer's non-cooperation, emphasizing procedural compliance under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Bharat Dhirajlal Mehta v. Oxyzo Financial Services Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act against an independent additional director due to lack of specific allegations of responsibility.
Akash Construction v. Indira Priyadarshini Hydro Power Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration challenge petitions under Section 34 become non-maintainable after approval of a Resolution Plan under IBC, as claims not included in the plan stand extinguished.
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. Jayesh Pravin Choudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and converted the interim relief petition under Section 9 into a Section 17 petition to be decided by the arbitrator, while directing status quo over mortgaged property pending arbitration.
Dr. Gyan Dhar Pathak v. Registrar, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent University to reconsider the petitioner's claim for upgradation from Research Assistant to Assistant Professor in accordance with UGC Regulations and Government guidelines, providing an opportunity of hearing and requiring UGC approval.