Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Arun Kumar Panchal v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking de-sealing of premises for removal of goods, holding that the petitioner must first avail the statutory appeal remedy against the sealing order under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act.
Gaya Prasad Yadav v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking relief to remove goods from sealed premises, holding that the petitioner must avail the statutory appeal remedy under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Sanjay Aggarwal v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking relief to remove goods from sealed premises, holding that the petitioner must first avail the statutory appeal remedy under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Farhad Khan v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking access to a sealed property, holding that the petitioner must first avail the statutory appeal remedy under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act.
Bhateri Devi v. Tara Chand (Deceased) Through LRs & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that admission of family settlement does not create presumption of specific shares without proof and allowed the appellant to file a suit for partition, modifying prior decrees and directing status quo.
Indraprastha Power Generation Company Ltd. v. Savinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of a government employee to retain lien in her parent company after tendering technical resignation to join another government undertaking on probation.
Shikha Chakraborty & Ors. v. Major Saumitra Sarkar (Retd) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte injunction restraining defendants from interfering with terrace construction, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie possession or exclusive rights over the terrace to justify such relief.
Gopi Nisha Mallah v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for aggravated sexual assault of a minor, affirming that reliable child testimony corroborated by medical and DNA evidence suffices for conviction under IPC and POCSO Act.
Vinod Mahajan v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's territorial jurisdiction and refused to quash proceedings against a director accused under the SEBI Act, emphasizing that factual issues like complicity cannot be decided at the quashing stage under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rajnish Kohli v. HCL Technologies Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant failed to exercise ESOP rights within the prescribed period post-IPO and that the suit was barred by limitation and lack of readiness to perform.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Praveen Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court re-assessed compensation in a motor accident claim, enhancing loss of dependency for a deceased housewife based on skilled worker wages and aligning non-pecuniary damages with Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi guidelines.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Praveen Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a deceased housewife’s legal heirs by reassessing notional income based on skilled worker wages and aligned the award with the Supreme Court’s ruling in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi.
Anu Kumari v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to relax the deadline for submitting cadre preferences in the 2017 Civil Services Examination due to a minor delay caused by technical issues, emphasizing fairness and merit.
Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Vigilance Commission
The Delhi High Court held that the CVC cannot initiate an inquiry based solely on a newspaper report as it does not constitute a formal complaint under the CVC Act, and set aside the inquiry against Walmart India.
Naresh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and 509 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.
Vikash & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Sanjay Kumar Gupta v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 based on an amicable settlement and payment of a compromise amount by the petitioner.
Mira Devi & Anr. v. Mohd Khalil & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by rejecting contributory negligence against minors and assessing income based on minimum wages payable to matriculates.
Mira Devi & Anr. v. Mohd Khalil & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by rejecting contributory negligence deductions and assessing income based on minimum wages payable to minors who were working.
Sanhedrin Consultants Private Limited v. Oil States Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition where the respondent bona fide disputed the debt claimed by the petitioner, emphasizing that disputed debts must be recovered through civil proceedings and not winding up.