Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Surender Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

07 Aug 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:6621-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the right of authorized vendors to continue holding the weekly market at the approved site and directed municipal authorities to regulate violations without discontinuing the market arbitrarily.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Certificate of Vending weekly market Town Vending Committee municipal regulation

Anil Kumar & Anr. v. Devender Kumar Garg @ Davinder Kumar

07 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6680

The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interim orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition interim order interlocutory order

Ranvijay Rai v. Ravindra Kumar Tiwari and Anr

07 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6679

The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal for non-deposit of the statutory amount as mandated under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

motor_vehicles / civil appeal_dismissed Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act statutory deposit appeal maintainability Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

RTDC Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Rohen Trehan

07 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6674

The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of a company director in a Section 138/141 NI Act case, holding that directors in a two-director company are presumed responsible for company affairs and that discharge applications under Section 251 CrPC are not maintainable in summons trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Director liability Discharge under Section 251 CrPC

Nishrin Saifudin Akolawala v. Savitri Telecom Services; Juzer Bharmal v. Savitri Telecom Services

07 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6678

The Delhi High Court held that directors can be held liable under Section 141 NI Act only if specifically shown to be responsible for the company's affairs, quashing summons against one director lacking such involvement while upholding summons against another with prima facie evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 Director liability

Aditya Rai Gupta v. State

07 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6676

The Delhi High Court quashed a conviction under the DPDP Act due to denial of fair trial rights and ordered a fresh trial, holding that a writ petition is maintainable when appeal is barred by petty sentence provisions.

criminal petition_allowed Significant natural justice fair trial Article 21 Section 3 DPDP Act

Sahib Sital Singh Bajwa & Ors. v. Aakash Educational Services Ltd. & Anr.

07 Aug 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2632
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award confirming termination of a franchise agreement and dues payable, holding that judicial interference in arbitration awards is limited and the award was passed within the extended limitation period including COVID-19 exclusion.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A limitation Section 34 challenge Section 37 appeal

Kavita Arora & Anr. v. Deepak Arora & Ors.

07 Aug 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:6542-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and review petition challenging a partition decree, holding that the Will was not pleaded or produced timely, delay was inordinate and not condonable, and the appellants had elected to abandon their rights under the Will.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will Limitation Review Petition Condonation of Delay

Netherland India Communication Enterprises Ltd & Anr. v. State Bank of India & Anr.

07 Aug 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:6544-DB

The High Court held that an appeal filed after a 13-year delay without sufficient cause cannot be entertained despite allegations of fraud, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws and the requirement of diligence in discovering fraud.

civil petition_dismissed Significant fraud vitiates everything condonation of delay limitation period Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993

SI (M) Sarvesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6634-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to re-file after impleading necessary parties.

constitutional petition_allowed writ petition withdrawal of petition leave to withdraw liberty to re-file

Sgt Manish Kumar Singh and Sgt Mritunjay v. HFO Satyvir Singh

07 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6640-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer rebuttal and limiting writ interference to jurisdictional errors.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces primary hypertension Release Medical Board

Mach Conferences and Events Private Limited v. Yatra Online Limited

07 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6656-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous an appeal against an interim order pending final adjudication of the interlocutory application, reserving liberty to the appellant to seek remedies thereafter.

civil appeal_dismissed interlocutory application ad interim order appeal infructuous appeal

Nitika Gupta v. Satya Dev Gupta

07 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6665

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner one last opportunity to cross-examine the respondent witness in a custody dispute, emphasizing the right to fair trial over procedural technicalities.

family petition_allowed custody case cross-examination amended memo of parties right to fair trial

Ram Avtar Singhal & Ors. v. Shri Sanatan Dharam Mandir & Ors.

07 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6664

The High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 challenging the Trial Court's status quo order, holding that the petitioners have an alternative remedy by way of appeal.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC status quo

M AND V MARKETING AND SALES PRIVATE LIMITED v. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DRI HQRS NEW DELHI & ORS

07 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6612-DB

The Delhi High Court relaxed onerous provisional release conditions imposed by Customs on seized perishable goods, affirming the adjudicating authority's discretion over Circular No. 35/2017-Customs.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant provisional release Customs Act, 1962 Section 110A bond and bank guarantee

Anita v. TDI Infrastructure Pvt Ltd & Anr

07 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6666

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of territorial jurisdiction, allowing the petitioner to approach the appropriate High Court where the cause of action arose.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

Vidushi Tyagi v. MS Celestial Knits and Fab Pvt Ltd

07 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6663

The Delhi High Court allowed belated filing of the written statement within 120 days from service of summons subject to costs, clarifying the procedural limits and court's discretion in civil suits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement forfeiture extension of time 120 days limit

Renuka Kulkarni v. Vishwendra Singh & Ors.

07 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6662

The Delhi High Court allowed a defendant to file a written statement after closure of the right, holding that limitation restarts from supply of amended plaint and inherent powers under Section 151 CPC permit such relief.

civil appeal_allowed written statement amended plaint limitation period Section 151 CPC

Union of India v. MWO (HFL) Manoj Kumar Singh (Retd)

07 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6638-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Primary Hypertension Release Medical Board

Union of India & Ors. v. WG CDR Kameshwar Prasad Mishra Retd

07 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type II, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type II armed forces Release Medical Board