Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Rameshwar Dayal v. Shyam Sunder Chopra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a possession suit, holding that nomination in a cooperative society does not confer title, the Will was not proved, and bona fide purchasers from an ostensible owner are protected under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Sh. Rajnish Khosla v. M/S Fair Wealth Securities Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that non-receipt of contract notes does not absolve a trader of liability if he was aware of and did not object to the trades.
M/S WIMPY INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. M/S N.F.T. CARRIERS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the appeal, reducing the transportation charges decree by 50% due to lack of evidence on mileage as required under the contract, emphasizing the claimant's burden to prove entitlement based on contractual terms.
Narender Gautam & Ors. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial discord on the basis of a settlement between the parties and their unwillingness to prosecute further.
Vinod Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 325 IPC in a matrimonial dispute after the parties settled amicably and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Samara Khan v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on the parties' settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution, imposing a cost condition on the petitioner.
Bhupinder Singh and Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on a settlement between the parties and the complainant's refusal to prosecute further.
Sunny @ Gattu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Sunny @ Gattu for robbery and stabbing under Sections 394/397/34 IPC based on consistent victim identification and corroborative medical evidence despite absence of forensic reports and Section 65B certificate.
Deepak Anand v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sessions Court's power to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. even after summons were issued by the Magistrate, dismissing a petition challenging the bail on jurisdictional grounds.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. M/S Earth Enterprises Ltd. & Ors.
The High Court upheld the joinder of two criminal cases involving a single conspiracy under Section 223 Cr.P.C., dismissing the CBI's petition challenging the joint trial order.
Sarabjit Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that notice to a company's director suffices as notice to the company under Section 138 NI Act, and restored the Magistrate's order summoning the company as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC.
Uma Devi v. Delhi Fruit & Vegetable Consumer Co-op. Federation Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that an employee holding possession on behalf of the employer has no independent right to the property and cannot maintain a suit for possession or injunction.
Rajiv @ Monu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder and criminal conspiracy based on admissible disclosure statements, circumstantial evidence, and conduct indicating guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Vishal Tokas v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from family disputes under non-heinous IPC offences based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC as guided by Supreme Court precedents.
Parmar Construction Company v. Northern Railways
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator, holding that judicial interference in ongoing arbitration is barred under Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Millennium & Copthorne International Limited v. Aryans Plaza Services Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the MILLENNIUM trademark and logo, recognizing transborder reputation and internet-based business as sufficient to establish prior user rights in India despite no physical presence.
Anand Agarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the CBI may investigate and arrest in a State without that State's prior consent under Section 6 DSPE Act if the case is registered in another State and the acts are part of the same criminal conspiracy.
Vipin Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the complainant withdrew the complaint.
Shanno Devi & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420A and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Manoj Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties reconciled and the complainant withdrew her complaint.