Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Abhay Singh Chandel & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC in a matrimonial dispute based on a genuine settlement and divorce, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Digjam Limited v. DLF Universal Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitration award granting refund with pendente lite interest and maintenance charges, dismissed forfeiture of earnest money, and clarified that liability adjustments against a related arbitration award depend on separate court adjudication under a scheme of arrangement.
State Bank of India v. Sanjay Kumar
The Delhi High Court quashed an industrial tribunal's award and orders due to judicial misconduct and bias, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication by a different officer.
Seema Begum v. Arun Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the correct multiplier based on the deceased's age, held the insurer liable despite an expired fitness certificate, and aligned non-pecuniary damages with Supreme Court precedents.
Seema Begum v. Arun Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a fatal motor accident claim, held insurer liable despite expired Fitness Certificate, and denied insurer's recovery rights against vehicle owner.
Bharti AXA General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Poonam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing future prospects addition to 40% and adjusting non-pecuniary heads in line with the Supreme Court’s Pranay Sethi ruling.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SHYAM @ DEEPAK
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation to the injured in a motor accident claim, upheld insurer's liability, and reduced interest on compensation to 9% per annum following Supreme Court precedent.
Dr. Neeraj Goyal v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside earlier orders framing charges to allow examination of crucial witnesses omitted during pre-charge evidence, ensuring a fair trial under Section 311 CrPC.
Dr. Neeraj Goyal v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside framing of charges against petitioners due to omission to examine crucial witnesses, directing re-examination under Section 311 CrPC to ensure fair trial.
Kashmiri Lal Garg v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused, holding that investigative deficiencies alone do not justify revocation of bail when the investigation concerning the accused is complete.
Phool Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court remanded property suits to the trial court to determine the exact land parcel of the disputed property based on demarcation reports, upholding injunctions only against forcible dispossession without due process.
Prem Chand v. Shamim Husain & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim and held the actual owner with Superdari liable to pay, clarifying owner liability and compensation assessment principles under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Prem Chand v. Shamim Husain & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation to injured motorcyclist and held actual vehicle owner liable despite non-registration, applying principles of ownership and future prospects in motor accident claims.
Anita Rani Mangla v. Bhagwat Dayal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for cancellation of forged documents starts from the plaintiff's knowledge of fraud and set aside the trial court's dismissal of the suit as barred by limitation.
Amar Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a Section 138 NI Act offence upon settlement and payment of costs, leading to the petitioner's acquittal.
Yash Bindlish & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Dharmender @ Dharmu & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a dispute over irrigation water following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to end futile criminal proceedings to restore peace.
Dharmender @ Dharmu & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a dispute over irrigation water after the parties amicably settled their differences, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile and contrary to justice.
Neeraj Kishore & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Shailender Singh & Anr v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following a mutual settlement and divorce between the parties.