Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Rockwool International A/S & Anr. v. Thermocare Rockwool (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that summary judgment was inappropriate in a trademark infringement suit over 'ROCKWOOL' due to disputed issues of genericness and estoppel, directing the suit to proceed to trial with interim injunctions against the defendant's use of the mark.
Ritnand Balved Education Foundation v. Ranchhod M Shah & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining Defendants from using the identical mark 'AMITY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL', holding Plaintiff as prior user and affirming jurisdiction under the Trade Marks Act.
Power Grid Corporation of India v. L.S. Cable
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award requiring Power Grid Corporation to reimburse service tax paid by LS Cables under a fixed price contract containing a change in law clause permitting such adjustment.
M/S ORCHID SALON SERVICES PVT LTD v. PRADYUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim order directing a tenant to deposit rent arrears despite disputed sub-letting claims, affirming tenant's liability under a registered lease and dismissing the appeal.
Surender Singh v. Lt. Governor, NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid, and recognized locus standi of a subsequent purchaser to claim compensation.
Omokhosio v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a foreign national accused under Sections 308/34 IPC and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, subject to conditions including visa extension penalty payment and surrender of passport.
Nitin Ranjan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following a full settlement and mutual consent divorce, as the complainant did not wish to continue prosecution.
Suraj v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a settlement and reconciliation between husband and wife, emphasizing the ends of justice.
Deepak Kapil & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420 and 406 IPC based on a full and final settlement between the parties, emphasizing the ends of justice and restoration of peace.
Deepak Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 IPC and related provisions based on an amicable settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the prosecutrix.
Ram Phal Singh Sahu v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 506 and 509 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Nidesh Malik & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes through mediation and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Kuldeep @Kannu & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 509, 324, and 34 IPC after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the complainants chose not to pursue prosecution.
V.K. Dewan & Co. v. Delhi Jal Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrator's award on costs after the petitioner withdrew claims but reduced the quantum of costs to a reasonable lumpsum amount payable to the respondent.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/S Ravi Builders
The Delhi High Court partially upheld an arbitral award on construction contract disputes, affirming the validity of the arbitration agreement and payments due, but setting aside escalation claims and modifying interest awards.
Yoginder Singh & Anr. v. Shankar Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim, holding insurer liable and applying future prospects and multiplier based on deceased's age as per Supreme Court precedent.
Yoginder Singh & Anr. v. Shankar Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim, holding insurer liable and applying future prospects and correct multiplier as per Supreme Court precedent.
Yoginder Singh & Anr. v. Shankar Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim, holding insurer liable and applying Supreme Court guidelines on future prospects and multiplier based on the deceased's age.
Renu Aggarwal & Anr. v. Baldev Raj Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging denial of leave to defend in summary suits under Order XXXVII CPC based on admitted loan agreement and dishonored cheques, holding vague pleas insufficient to raise triable issues.
Renu Aggarwal & Anr. v. Baldev Raj Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging dismissal of leave to defend applications in summary suits under Order XXXVII CPC based on admitted loan agreement and dishonored cheques, holding that vague allegations do not entitle defendants to defend.