Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's method of recognizing income from prepaid telecom cards on actual usage or expiry, dismissing the Revenue's appeal that income accrues on receipt of payment.
M/S S.A BUILDERS LTD. v. M.C.D (NOW REPRESENTED DELHI JAL BOARD)
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in favor of the contractor with modifications, emphasizing adherence to contractual terms and rejecting new pleas not raised before the Arbitrator.
Bhupinder Singh & Anr. v. Attar Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the written statement to rely on a partition deed after trial commencement, holding that due diligence was shown, but imposed costs for the delay caused.
Saraswati Yadav v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners involved in cross FIRs alleging assault and theft, emphasizing cooperation in investigation and the nature of cross allegations.
Anand Kumar Mohatta v. State (Delhi Government)
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and charge sheet under Section 406 IPC, holding that the dispute over a security deposit was civil in nature and did not constitute a criminal offence, thereby preventing abuse of criminal process.
M/S GREENGOLD ANIMATION PVTLTD v. WS ACME HOUSEWARES INDIA PVTLTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed the trial court to consider the appellant's injunction application on merits despite a delay in filing the suit, holding that reasonable explanation for delay must be considered.
M/S GREEN GOLD ANIMATION PVT LTD v. TECH CONNECT RETAIL PMVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing the trial court to consider the appellant's ex-parte injunction application on merits despite a short delay in filing the suit.
HLS Asia Limited & Anr v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging recovery notices as infructuous following respondents' withdrawal of the notices pending the Supreme Court's decision on the SFIS scheme applicability.
Shobha p. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection from arrest to accused in an attempt-to-burn case, directing police to ensure victim safety and investigate forensic delays.
Reliance Cable Industries v. Commissioner of GST (East) Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the demand of duty and penalty against Reliance Cable Industries for clandestine removal of goods, affirming the findings of the Commissioner and CESTAT based on corroborated evidence and statements.
Prince Roadlines v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award blacklisting transport trucks based on unproven inspection reports and contradictory findings, upholding only the refund of recoveries.
Union of India v. Munni Lal Menna & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order restoring the promotion and seniority of an employee regularized during another employee's penalty period, holding that administrative instructions cannot override statutory disciplinary rules.
Pandit Restaurant (Upvan) & Ors. v. Hotel & Restaurant Association of Northern India (HRANI) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction against termination of their association membership, holding that the association acted within its powers and the court will not interfere without jurisdictional or procedural violations.
Dinesh & Anr. v. State N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for dowry death and cruelty under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC based on medical evidence of injuries and consistent testimony of harassment related to dowry demands.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sh. Surendra Dhillon
The Delhi High Court upheld that a government servant can withdraw a voluntary retirement application before acceptance by the appointing authority, and retirement becomes effective only upon such acceptance or expiry of the notice period without refusal.
Vijaya Kumar Anugandula v. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a PSU cannot enforce a minimum ₹6 lakh indemnity clause in a Service Bond as a penalty and directed payment of reasonable damages reflecting actual training costs when employees leave for other government organizations.
Vijaya Kumar Anugandula v. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that DFCCIL cannot enforce an excessive ₹6 lakh liquidated damages clause in Service Bonds against employees leaving for other government organizations without completing five years, limiting damages to reasonable costs incurred.
Vijaya Kumar Anugandula v. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that DFCCIL cannot enforce a minimum ₹6 lakh penalty for premature termination of service bonds against employees without scientific training and directed recovery of reasonable damages instead.
Vijaya Kumar Anugandula v. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that DFCCIL cannot enforce an excessive ₹6 lakh penalty for breach of Service Bond and directed payment of reasonable damages reflecting actual training costs, while clarifying applicability of government OMs on bond enforcement for employees moving between government organizations.
Swarn Kaur v. Poonam Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted specific performance directing defendants to execute the sale deed in favor of the plaintiff upon payment of the balance consideration, affirming the purchaser's right where contractual obligations were fulfilled.