Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Devesh Manaswi Das v. Aparnashree
The Delhi High Court modified Family Court custody directions to enhance the father's visitation rights and allowed a future joint-parenting plan application for overnight custody, prioritizing the child's welfare.
RSB Projects Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a railway construction contract due to the respondent's failure to appoint an arbitrator.
Kirti Gupta v. Shekhar Goyal
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial dispute case to the court where related domestic violence proceedings are pending, deferring to the wife's wishes for judicial convenience.
Sporting & Outdoor Ad-Agency Private Ltd. v. Netlinkblue Media Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over payment liability and service quality in company liquidation proceedings under Section 446(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 are triable issues requiring evidence before adjudication.
Bibek Singh Mehta v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court partially quashed the FIR against a partner of a firm accused of cheating and breach of trust after all complainants amicably settled their disputes with him.
Naseem Bano v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking interim protection against possession under the SARFAESI Act, holding that the petitioner must exhaust statutory remedies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
Delhivery Limited v. Far Left Retail Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that sufficient pre-arbitration efforts were made and service objections are to be decided by the arbitrator.
M/S SHREE PADMA INDUSTRIES v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to non-provision of annexure and remitted the matter for re-adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity to reply and be heard.
S S Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective reasons and proper notice, setting aside retrospective cancellation from 2017 and limiting it to the date of order in 2019.
Vandana Gupta v. Surender Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that the landlord is the best judge of suitability of premises for bona fide requirement and set aside the order granting leave to contest eviction based on alleged alternate accommodation in a garage.
SANDEEP KOHLI & ORS. v. VEENA SARWAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court clarified that an interim arbitral order restraining trademark use on digital platforms applies only to future business ventures and does not affect existing businesses, thereby maintaining status quo during arbitration.
Dr. Suman Bala v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid from the date of retirement and remanded the issue of the interest rate to the Tribunal for uniform determination.
Shyam Singh v. M C D
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits of a government employee accrues from the date of retirement, modifying the Tribunal's order to ensure payment with interest from that date.
Dr. Shamoli Kundu v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, not from the Tribunal's order, and modified the interest rate accordingly.
S v. Jeet Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed police to enhance protection measures for a petitioner facing social media harassment and threats from relatives, ensuring police responsiveness and surveillance to safeguard her and her family.
Nawabuddin v. Salahuddin & Anr.
In a family partition suit over jointly owned property, the Delhi High Court directed sale of the property and division of proceeds among co-owners due to lack of consensus on physical partition, and impleaded the transferee of a co-owner's share as a party.
Subhash Sharma v. Govt of NCT, Delhi & Ors.
Criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act were quashed as the petitioner was exonerated on identical charges in departmental proceedings, making continuation an abuse of process.
Naveen Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the composite marking scheme in a recruitment exam, holding that courts will not interfere with predetermined evaluation procedures uniformly applied by the examination authority.
PT BUKAKA TEKNIK UTAMA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT), DELHI - 2
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee whose appeal before CIT(A) was dismissed on delay grounds but whose limitation for further appeal had not expired as on the specified date is eligible for settlement benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Sanjay Singh Yadav v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a departmental candidate who failed to join service timely, holding that continuation of lien does not entitle a candidate to recruitment benefits without availability and willingness to join.