Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

M/S. PARDARSHI v. Union of India

20 May 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J · 2024:DHC:4230-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 'Past Performance' requirement in government tenders, ruling that Start-Ups exempted from 'Experience Criteria' must still satisfy 'Past Performance' conditions, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Start-Up exemption Experience Criteria Past Performance Government E-Market Place (GEM)

Ajay Jain v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi

20 May 2024 · Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:4158-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the attachment of flats for recovery of maintenance charges under a valid arbitral award, holding the occupant liable regardless of membership status.

civil appeal_dismissed Cooperative Society Maintenance Charges Arbitral Award Enforcement

MAA PADMAWATI LAMINATION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR ANKUR JAIN v. COMMISSIONER DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX

20 May 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:4192-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for excess Input Tax Credit due to non-consideration of the taxpayer's reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication with a personal hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Input Tax Credit GST Section 75(3) CGST Act Demand order

Amrish Aggarwal Trading as M/s Mahalaxmi Product v. M/s Venus Home Appliances Pvt Ltd & Anr

17 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4482

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 124(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, a suit for trademark infringement must be mandatorily stayed upon filing of a rectification petition challenging the mark's validity, notwithstanding the abolition of the IPAB.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Section 124 Trade Marks Act 1999 rectification petition stay of suit proceedings abolition of IPAB

Ajay Singh v. Kal Airways Private Limited & Anr.

17 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing refund and interest payments in a dispute over a share sale agreement, affirming that arbitral tribunals must act within contract terms and that refund is permissible where breach prevents contract performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Restitution Section 65 Indian Contract Act

Ethos Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 206 Zone 11 Delhi & Anr

17 May 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:4135-DB

The High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice Input Tax Credit

Anjana Kumar v. Vivek Goel & Anr.

17 May 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:4525

The Delhi High Court granted a preliminary decree of partition to the plaintiff for her 1/3rd share in ancestral property, rejecting the defendants' plea of oral partition due to lack of registered documents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition decree oral partition Hindu Succession Act Order XII Rule 6 CPC

Anand Kumar Saluja v. Girish Kakar & Anr.

17 May 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:4043

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and valid landlord-tenant relationship despite tenant's challenge to ownership and alternate accommodation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction petition landlord-tenant relationship bona fide requirement

Charat Singh v. Rajiv Kumar & Ors.

17 May 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4690

The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt proceedings against respondents for non-compliance of an order relating to Gram Sabha land encroachments, holding that jurisdiction had transferred to the Delhi Development Authority, which must now take action.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt proceedings unauthorized construction encroachment Gram Sabha land

GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Cactus Pharmaceuticals Private Limited and Others

17 May 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:4671

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to GSK against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off of the "CEFTUM" mark by deceptively similar marks "CEFTUS" and "CEFBACTUM" in pharmaceutical products.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction pharmaceutical trademarks

GAIL GAS LIMITED v. M/S OKAY GLASS INDUSTRIES

17 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4339

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner’s tampering counterclaims, directed refund of security deposits with interest to the respondent, and disposed of the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge meter tampering gas supply contract

K. Jeganathan v. P. Sampath

17 May 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:4483

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act on the basis of a comprehensive settlement agreement subsuming the original disputes, following the Supreme Court precedent in Gimpex.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 NI Act Settlement agreement Quashing of complaint Section 482 CrPC

Sangeeta v. The Delhi United Christian Sr. Sec. School & Anr

17 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4242

The Delhi High Court held that State-imposed marking schemes for teacher recruitment do not apply to minority aided schools, affirming their constitutional autonomy and directing release of salary and grant-in-aid to the petitioner.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant minority educational institution Article 30(1) Constitution of India grant-in-aid marking scheme

Inder Prakash Singh v. Raj Mahatim Singh & Ors.

17 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4338

The Delhi High Court upheld a bona fide family settlement deed partitioning a jointly owned property among brothers, dismissing the Plaintiff's suit for fresh partition and damages despite his denial of the settlement's validity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant family settlement partition property dispute registration

Vipin Khanna v. Sujoy Veer Suri & Ors.

17 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4408

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit seeking cancellation of a conveyance deed and declaration of ownership, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove better title or adverse possession and the suit was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed conveyance deed adverse possession declaration of title agreement to sell

Shiv Raj Dedha & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi

17 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4025

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a minor student altercation under Sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Inderjeet v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

17 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4037

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from minor family disputes under Sections 352, 354A, 506, and 509 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR minor family dispute Section 352 IPC

Salman @ Salman Khan and Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

17 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4024

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324, 341, 506, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC for minor offences.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Anil Kumar Jain v. State & Anr.

17 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:4206

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging forgery of a Will, holding that the existence of a civil dispute does not bar criminal investigation where prima facie material discloses cognizable offences.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR civil dispute with criminal angle forgery of Will

Shan Miyan Chaudhary and Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

17 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:4031

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR for impersonation and forgery, holding that serious offences affecting society cannot be quashed merely on the basis of a settlement between parties.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR settlement in criminal cases impersonation