Delhi High Court
49,110 judgments
Rakesh v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging sealing actions initiated by the Supreme Court-appointed Monitoring Committee, holding that only the Monitoring Committee and Supreme Court have jurisdiction to entertain such matters.
Arshad Malik v. State; Islamuddin & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the husband and in-laws of a deceased woman in a dowry death case, emphasizing the need for fair investigation and imposing conditions to safeguard the process.
Arun Jain v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award forfeiting the contractor's performance bank guarantee due to non-performance and dismissed the petition challenging the award.
Pawan Kumar Yadav & Anr. v. Shail Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a partition-related miscellaneous case, holding that procedural grievances without bias or miscarriage of justice do not justify transfer.
Pawan Kumar Sharma v. Neelam Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the three-year limitation period for revocation of probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act starts from the date of grant of probate, dismissing the appeal filed beyond this period.
Unitech Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana
The Delhi High Court quashed the criminal summons under Section 74(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, as premature due to the appellate tribunal's extension of the repayment period, holding that criminal proceedings can only commence after the final expiry of such extended time.
Unitech Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana
The Delhi High Court set aside the criminal summons under Section 74(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that proceedings initiated before the expiry of the extended repayment period granted by the Appellate Tribunal were premature and an abuse of process.
Amul Gabrani & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute under Sections 406, 420, and 120B IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as guided by Supreme Court precedent.
Amul Gabrani v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute under Sections 406, 420, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rajesh & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 323, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement between neighbors, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ramesh Sahu v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 448 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Nitesh Kumar @ Nitesh Kapoor v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 284, 287, and 304A IPC on the basis of settlement and compensation paid to the deceased's heirs, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD v. NEXT GENERATION BUSINESS POWER SYSTEMS LTD
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award directing unconditional payment to a subcontractor, holding that payment was conditional on receipt from the principal employer under a back-to-back contract and that failure to fulfill contractual obligations justified withholding payments.
Khem Chand v. Bhagwati @ Laxmi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim maintenance orders, holding that the petitioner failed to prove inability to pay and that maintenance can be granted based on notional income.
Mukhtiyar Khan v. Devi Ram @ Bhagatji & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed maintenance of status quo in a property possession dispute pending disposal of an injunction application, dismissing the appeal against the trial court's order issuing notice without granting ex-parte injunction.
Sports Station (India) Pvt Ltd v. Sunil Rai @ Suneil Rai
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an ex parte decree due to failure to prove proper service of summons on the respondent.
M/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD v. M/S CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS (C-DOT)
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim arbitral award on disputed royalty payments, affirming the arbitrator's procedural discretion and rejecting challenges under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Harmony Ayurvedic College and Hospital v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner Ayurvedic college to admit students for the 2018-19 session by extending the admission deadline, holding that private colleges must be treated equally with government colleges regarding permission despite perceived deficiencies.
Surender Singh Deswal v. DDA; Chhavi Aggrawal v. DDA
The Delhi High Court held that DDA must allot surrendered flats from the 2008 Housing Scheme to waitlisted candidates by holding a draw within the validity period, rejecting DDA's inclusion of such flats in a subsequent scheme.
Omjee Texfab Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of OMJEE TEXFAB PRIVATE LIMITED after finding full compliance with the Companies Act, 1956.