Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Mohd. Shahrukh v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 392 IPC due to contradictory prosecution evidence and unreliable identification of stolen property, granting the appellant the benefit of doubt.
Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging forgery of design registration documents due to lack of prima facie evidence and bar of limitation, emphasizing careful judicial scrutiny before summoning accused.
Cadbury U K Limited v. Manoj Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark and copyright infringement suit by consent based on a settlement agreement containing undertakings to cease infringing use and withdraw conflicting registrations, and ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff.
M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. v. VIKRAM SURI TRADING AS M/S ARMEX AUTO INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court held that service of a counter statement by email without an email ID provided by the opponent does not constitute valid service under Section 143 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and set aside the order deeming the opposition abandoned.
Karam Bir v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging AICTE's remedial examination modalities, holding that adequate public notice was given, registration deadlines must be respected, and no legal basis existed to relax pass criteria or round off marks.
PVR INOX LTD. v. SHEETAL ANSAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court referred disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 and 3 to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving the inclusion of respondent 2 to the arbitrator's determination.
Neeraj Kumar Uttam v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF to decide the petitioner's application for withdrawal of resignation under Rule 26(4) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, emphasizing that tentative file notings do not constitute binding acceptance.
M/S AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. M/S PANDIT AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court directed reference of disputes under a Supply Agreement to arbitration and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the respondent's consent.
GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. v. SURENDRA SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest on delayed retiral benefits and interest on that interest, ruling that the Interest Act's prohibition on interest on interest does not apply to such administrative tribunal orders.
Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act due to failure to nominate an arbitrator, directing arbitration to proceed under SAROD rules.
Ajay Deep Construction Pvt Ltd v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after the respondent failed to nominate one, directing arbitration to proceed under SAROD rules.
REACH DREDGING LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the tendering authority's acceptance of the L-1 bidder's eligibility, dismissing the writ petition challenging the tender process as neither arbitrary nor unreasonable.
Karan A Chanana v. Govt. of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of proceedings against a director held vicariously liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonour of company cheques, emphasizing that factual disputes must be resolved at trial.
Ikechukwu Chukwubuikem Stanley v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court extended interim bail on humanitarian grounds due to the petitioner's wife's medical condition and exempted her from personal appearance for surety bond acceptance.
Nirmala Devi & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a dowry death case based on a non-incriminating suicide note and their cooperation with investigation.
Nirmala Devi & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 34 IPC, relying on their cooperation with investigation and a suicide note exonerating them, without commenting on the merits.
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. FUTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining alienation of the Dreamplex Mall as additional security for outstanding loans, holding that the lender can independently enforce multiple securities pending arbitration.
Akhilesh Rawat & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging JNU's policy on Ph.D. supervision by permitting the co-supervisor to take over after the original supervisor's retirement without ruling on the policy's validity.
Akhilesh Rawat & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Prof. Rajeev Kumar's application to recall the disposal order and re-enter a writ petition after he was deleted as a party and did not challenge that deletion, holding he lacked locus standi as the final order did not affect his rights.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Ananya Enterprises
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, rejecting a one-sided arbitration clause and referring disputes under a loan agreement to arbitration.