Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited v. Goods and Service Tax Officer Ward 203 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed replies and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity for personal hearing and a speaking order.
Noyal Data Ram @ Babu Ram v. Bhushan & Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to admit belated documents not supported by pleadings in a partition suit, emphasizing the need for due diligence and reasonable explanation under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC.
M/S Apeksa International & Anr. v. Employee State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Section 85(g) of the ESI Act for failure to timely register employees, holding that disputed factual issues require trial and employer registration alone does not absolve statutory duties.
Veena Malhotra v. Gurminder Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a drawer who signs a cheque is prima facie liable under Section 138 NI Act despite others filling cheque particulars, and quashing of complaint is not warranted at the notice stage.
Dr Shilpa Jain v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner's eligibility under UGC guidelines with a liberal interpretation of 'and/or' and to afford her a personal hearing before passing any adverse order.
Sarika Chaturvedi v. Agarwal Auto Traders
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitrator's mandate had not expired and dismissed the petition for substitution, directing continuation of arbitration with the same arbitrator and imposing costs on the respondents for causing delays.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited v. Kavita and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident claim award, upholding the Tribunal's finding of rash and negligent driving based on credible eyewitness and police evidence.
Ajay Paswan v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking custody of his minor wife and child, upholding the Child Welfare Committee’s protective custody order and noting serious charges against the petitioner under IPC and POCSO.
Nishi Handa v. Manju Kanwar
The Delhi High Court decreed partition of a leasehold property between co-owners based on a clear Will and relinquishment deed, overruling inconsistent mutation entries and clarifying ownership and possession rights.
Raj Kumar Pandey and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
M/S Volunteer for Village Development v. M/S Innovative Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Fund Raising Services Agreement containing an arbitration clause.
Hardial Singh v. Vivek Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that the landlord's bona fide requirement was established and the tenant failed to disclose a prima facie case to contest eviction.
Gaurav Goel & Ors. v. IDBI Bank Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that banks must provide borrowers with underlying documents and a fair opportunity to represent before classifying accounts as fraud under RBI Master Directions, reinforcing the principles of natural justice.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. R. Vasudevan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the CBI's late-stage application to produce original hard disks as evidence, holding that prosecution's prior concession and delay violated the accused's right to a fair trial.
Munna Singh & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that taking accused into custody without pronouncing and supplying the judgment as mandated under Section 353 Cr.P.C. is a procedural lapse violating statutory and constitutional rights but does not vitiate conviction if rectified subsequently.
Sharanjeet Kaur v. IDBI Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the closure of a sexual harassment complaint by the ICC, holding that an alternative remedy under Section 18 of the POSH Act is available and bars maintainability of a writ petition.
Jagriti Jain v. Principal District and Session Judge - North & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL concerning pendency and connectivity issues in Digital NI Act Courts after respondents created an additional court and resolved network problems, satisfying the petitioner's concerns.
Faizan Qureshi & Ors. v. The State of Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D, 506, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in non-serious offences.
Arihant Jain and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Raj Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a dowry death case due to insufficient and contradictory prosecution evidence failing to prove cruelty and dowry demand beyond reasonable doubt.