Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Indian Compressors Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed refund of unjustified subletting charges and mandated processing of leasehold to freehold conversion despite alleged encroachments, upholding a final arbitral award and prior court orders.
Shashi Ranjan Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that delay in review medical examination caused by the employer should not prejudice a candidate's seniority or benefits, directing seniority to be fixed from the batchmates' joining date with consequential benefits.
Sunil Duggal & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants for dowry-related strangulation death, emphasizing the burden under Section 106 of the Evidence Act and rejecting belated alibi pleas.
Indian Compressors Limited v. The Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed refund of wrongly demanded subletting charges and ordered processing of the petitioner's leasehold-to-freehold conversion application despite alleged encroachment, upholding an arbitral award and prior court directions.
Afilias India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld NIXI's award of the.IN Registry contract to the third respondent, holding that the tender process was fair and the third respondent met the technical qualifications, dismissing the petitioner's challenge as unfounded.
E. Virendra Pandey v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer of a CPWD Executive Engineer from Delhi to Behrampur, holding it was justified by service exigencies and complied with revised tenure guidelines, dismissing allegations of mala fide.
TERUMO PENPOL PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that manufacturers cannot cumulatively increase MRPs beyond 10% annually under DPCO, 2013 and remanded the matter to NPPA to reassess overcharged amounts based on actual sale prices.
Manjeet Singh v. Rakesh Billa
The Delhi High Court held that a plaintiff cannot claim contractual penalty amounts without pleading and proving actual loss, and framed issues focusing on genuineness of payment and signatures for trial.
Dharam Raj v. U.O.I & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking regularization of an illegally occupied additional strip of government land and upheld refusal to convert the main property to freehold due to encroachment.
Deepak Rao & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 494, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajesh Nayyar v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Atul Aswal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Atul Beri & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable mediated settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Narender Dutt Sharma & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving offences with a predominant civil element on the basis of settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Waseem @ Tanni @ Tarik Waseem v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354D, and 506 IPC on the basis of settlement between parties and the complainant's affidavit, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a full and amicable settlement between the parties.
Sudhir Chadha; Narender Singh; Sudesh Jain; Rajat Jain; K L Bajaj; Anil Kumar Sharma; Jasveen Kaur v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The High Court held that a trial court must await a comprehensive police report before ordering FIR registration under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., and civil settlements do not bar criminal proceedings.