Delhi High Court
47,739 judgments
GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. v. SURENDRA SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest on delayed retiral benefits and interest on that interest, ruling that the Interest Act's prohibition on interest on interest does not apply to such administrative tribunal orders.
Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act due to failure to nominate an arbitrator, directing arbitration to proceed under SAROD rules.
Ajay Deep Construction Pvt Ltd v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after the respondent failed to nominate one, directing arbitration to proceed under SAROD rules.
REACH DREDGING LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the tendering authority's acceptance of the L-1 bidder's eligibility, dismissing the writ petition challenging the tender process as neither arbitrary nor unreasonable.
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. FUTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining alienation of the Dreamplex Mall as additional security for outstanding loans, holding that the lender can independently enforce multiple securities pending arbitration.
Akhilesh Rawat & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging JNU's policy on Ph.D. supervision by permitting the co-supervisor to take over after the original supervisor's retirement without ruling on the policy's validity.
Akhilesh Rawat & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Prof. Rajeev Kumar's application to recall the disposal order and re-enter a writ petition after he was deleted as a party and did not challenge that deletion, holding he lacked locus standi as the final order did not affect his rights.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Ananya Enterprises
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, rejecting a one-sided arbitration clause and referring disputes under a loan agreement to arbitration.
Dr. Prabal Pal v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the writ petition by quashing the second Article of Charge for lack of actionable misconduct while permitting the disciplinary inquiry to continue on the first charge.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. TIRUPATI TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to refer disputes under a loan agreement to arbitration, holding that unilateral appointment clauses are unenforceable and arbitration must proceed under institutional rules.
Sudha Gupta & Anr. v. A K Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award granting a counter-claim to a director personally instead of the company entitled under the contract, holding that an arbitrator must act within the contract's scope and parties.
Experion Developers Private Limited v. UP Television Network Private Limited
Delhi High Court held that a defamatory report against a real estate company was false and malicious, granted permanent injunction and Rs. 5 lakh damages, affirming a company's right to sue for defamation and the court's jurisdiction over online publications.
GENESISINFRATECHPVTLTD v. TARUNPURI
The Delhi High Court directed disputes arising from loan and sale agreements to arbitration while allowing concurrent criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act to continue.
PURI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that payments of External Development Charges to Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran attract TDS under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, making the petitioners liable for tax deduction and penalty proceedings.
Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Dr. T.R Srinivasan
The Delhi High Court held that administrative staff of IGNOU are not "teachers" under the Act and Statutes and thus not entitled to superannuation at 65 years or Career Advancement Scheme benefits, setting aside the Single Judge's contrary decision based on an invalid Ordinance.
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD v. MEENU DADEIA@MEENU VARDHAN
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's decision that a contractual employee of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi qualifies as a departmental candidate entitled to age relaxation for recruitment purposes.