Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Sanman Distributors Pvt Ltd v. Ana Arc Pvt Ltd & Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:1734-DB

The Delhi High Court directed safe custody of title deeds and undertakings from secured creditors upon payment of dues in a loan recovery dispute, affirming expeditious disposal of related applications by the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Debt Recovery Tribunal Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 title deeds

Roopak Stores Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Roopaks Pik-N-Pay & Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:1733
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court refused interim injunction against defendants' use of the mark 'ROOPAK' due to plaintiffs' unexplained delay and defendants' long-standing use, directing expedited trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction trademark infringement ROOPAK Dissolution Deed

Anirudh Kumar v. Jagat Narain & Sons HUF & Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:1737

The Delhi High Court granted specific performance of an oral agreement for sale of property, directing the defendant legal heir to execute the sale deed upon payment of the balance price.

civil appeal_allowed specific performance oral agreement immovable property legal heir

Achla Sabharwal v. A. Saptrishi Films & Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · Vinod Goel · 2019:DHC:1707

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring Mumbai courts jurisdiction over a copyright dispute, dismissing the appeal challenging the plaint's return for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant exclusive jurisdiction clause copyright ownership Section 62 Copyright Act 1957 Section 28 Indian Contract Act

Netrapal Singh v. Ravinder Kumar Kalyanai & Anr.

25 Mar 2019 · Vinod Goel · 2019:DHC:1704

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the trial court's grant of leave to defend but held the loan recovery suit barred by limitation and liable to be dismissed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation period loan recovery Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend

Allied Medical Ltd. v. Uttar Pradesh Health Systems Strengthening Project

25 Mar 2019 · Vinod Goel · 2019:DHC:1705

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against blacklisting for breach of contract, holding that blacklisting is an inherent business discretion not subject to interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, especially where the appellant concealed material facts and gave false assurances.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant blacklisting contract termination Section 9 Arbitration Act clean hands doctrine

Sanjay Sharma v. Sudhir Malhotra & Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · Vinod Goel · 2019:DHC:1706

The Delhi High Court upheld that a sale deed executed in violation of a status quo order and during pendency of suit is null, binding transferees pendente lite to deliver possession as per decree for specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant status quo order sale deed specific performance Section 52 Transfer of Property Act

Chitra Khanna v. Lt Governor National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:1708-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging land acquisition proceedings and award, holding that stale claims and possession disputes cannot be revived under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act after acceptance of compensation and delay.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) 2013 Act laches possession

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 v. Make My Trip India Pvt. Ltd.

25 Mar 2019 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:1711-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT ruling that payment gateway charges paid by Make My Trip to banks are fees for banking services and not commission, thus no TDS under Section 194H is deductible.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant payment gateway charges tax deduction at source Section 40(a)(ia) Section 194H

M/S LAXYO ENERGY LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

25 Mar 2019 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:1723-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging bid rejection for non-submission of mandatory demand draft, holding that online payment to the tender portal does not substitute the required demand draft payment.

administrative petition_dismissed e-tender Notice Inviting Tender demand draft cost of tender documents

Ravinder v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:1710-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking deemed lapsing of land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, holding that possession was taken or deemed taken and compensation accepted, barring reopening of settled acquisition disputes.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:1712-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking declaration of lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that stale claims and delayed approaches cannot revive acquisition rights once possession is taken or deemed with the authority.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition lapse of acquisition compensation

Sube Singh v. Lt Governor NCT of Delhi

25 Mar 2019 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:1709-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking declaration of lapsing of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that acceptance of compensation and Supreme Court orders deem possession with the acquiring authority, barring stale claims.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

Vice Chairman, Delhi Agricultural Mktg. Board v. H.R. Builders

25 Mar 2019 · Navin Chawla · 2019:DHC:1726

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting extension of time for delay in construction work despite absence of formal notice by the contractor, emphasizing the binding contractual obligation on the authority to grant fair extensions under Clause 5.[4] of the GCC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Extension of Time General Conditions of Contract Clause 5.[4]

Pawan Gaur v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr

25 Mar 2019 · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:1725

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner holding a valid arms license, ruling that mere possession without conscious knowledge of a live cartridge does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant conscious possession Section 25 Arms Act 1959 live cartridge arms license

Pushpandra Singh Parmar v. UC Web Mobile Private Limited

25 Mar 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:1728-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the disposal of a suit for permanent injunction based on his undertaking not to disrupt or disparage the respondent, holding that such an undertaking justified the suit's disposal.

civil appeal_dismissed permanent injunction undertaking disparaging statements email communication

A K v. C M

25 Mar 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:1727-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the Family Court's interim visitation order to grant the father increased overnight visitation rights, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child and maintaining parental bonds.

family appeal_allowed Significant visitation rights welfare of minor child Guardian and Wards Act custody

Jagroop Singh Gill v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)

25 Mar 2019 · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:1729

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under the Arms Act against a licensed arms holder due to lack of conscious possession of a live cartridge found in his baggage.

criminal petition_allowed Significant conscious possession Arms Act, 1959 live cartridge Section 25 Arms Act

Sardar Gurbachan Singh & Ors. v. Sardar Avtar Singh & Ors.

25 Mar 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · CS(OS) 82/1997

The court dismissed defendants' belated application to summon additional witnesses after closure of evidence, holding it an abuse of process and emphasizing the sanctity of counsel's statements and timely conduct in civil litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant summoning witnesses closure of evidence abuse of process specific performance

M/S M.V.R INDUSTRY LIMITED v. M/S TRIBAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING

25 Mar 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:1730

The Delhi High Court dismissed MVR's challenge to an ex-parte arbitral award for breach of contract and upheld TRIFED's Rs. 73.56 crore damages claim, holding the petition barred by limitation and service valid at last known address.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation Service of notice