Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Kristal Vision Projects Private Limited v. Union of India

27 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4652

The Delhi High Court held that delivery of an arbitral award during a virtual hearing and direction to collect physical copies satisfies Section 31(5) of the Arbitration Act, and delay in collecting the award does not extend the limitation period under Section 34(3), dismissing the petition as time-barred.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral award delivery Section 31(5) Arbitration Act Section 34(3) Arbitration Act Limitation period

SS Rail Works Pvt Ltd v. Ircon International Limited

27 May 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:4696-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of a railway signalling tender and upheld the technical disqualification of the petitioner’s bid, emphasizing limited judicial interference in bona fide tender evaluation and administrative decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender cancellation technical disqualification judicial review essential qualifying criteria

Federation of Tata Communications Employees Unions v. Union of India & Ors.

27 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4679

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable against Tata Communications Limited post-privatization as it ceased to be a 'State' under Article 12, dismissing the employees' writ petition on maintainability grounds.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India writ jurisdiction privatization

Dinesh Jindal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 20, Delhi & Ors.

27 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4554-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 following a search conducted after 1 April 2021 is barred by limitation if issued beyond the ten-year block period computed from the date of receipt of seized material, not the date of search.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149 Section 153A

R B Seth Jessa Ram Hospital and Bros v. Ramesh Chand

27 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4633

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's imposition of costs for repeated adjournments, emphasizing that adjournments must be granted only for sufficient cause to ensure speedy justice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant adjournment costs Labour Court writ petition

Vikas Jaglan v. Food Corporation of India

27 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4521

The Delhi High Court held that withholding a candidate’s examination results on suspicion of unfair means requires issuance of a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing before adverse action.

administrative other Significant writ petition Article 226 recruitment withholding results

George Ninan v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:4468

The Delhi High Court held that a Chief Financial Officer who signs a cheque on behalf of a company is prima facie liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour, dismissing the petition to quash the complaint.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Chief Financial Officer liability

Shivkumar Shankarrao Thakur & Ors. v. Shiv Biri Manufacturing Co P Ltd & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4300-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the registration of a trademark, holding that the impugned mark was not deceptively similar to the appellants' marks and upholding the Registrar's decision without imposing geographical limitations.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed trademark registration deceptive similarity prior use geographical limitation

Bilquis v. Jamia Milia Islamia

27 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging eviction and demolition orders, holding the suits barred by res judicata and lacking cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant res judicata Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC Public Premises Act 1958

Subodh Anand v. C.B.I.

27 May 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:4395

The Delhi High Court acquitted a police officer accused of bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act Section 20 PC Act presumption

MS Asandas and Sons Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:4542
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the government's decision to cap incentives under the PLI Scheme for food processing and held that scheme amendments made in public interest are lawful and binding on applicants.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Production Linked Incentive Scheme Food Processing Industry CAGR cap Committed investment

Shubham Pal & Ors. v. Staff Selection Commission & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:4421-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the SSC's CGLE 2023 answer key and results, holding that courts should not interfere with expert evaluation absent manifest error or statutory provision for re-evaluation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant competitive examination answer key re-evaluation judicial review

Ranjit Singh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4505

The Delhi High Court directed fresh demarcation proceedings to resolve a boundary dispute between private landowners and forest department, allowing temporary placement of boundary pillars pending final demarcation.

property petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 land demarcation boundary dispute

Vishwas Pathak v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

27 May 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:4475

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction by a non-neighbor petitioner lacking locus standi and failing to show violation of fundamental or legal rights.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 locus standi unauthorized construction illegal construction

Samiksha Chaudhary & Ors. v. Maulana Azad Medical College & Anr.

27 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:4284
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that completion of mandatory clinical postings and training duration is essential for eligibility to appear in the 3rd Professional Part II MBBS Examination, dismissing the petitioners' claim to appear earlier.

education petition_dismissed Significant MBBS Examination Clinical Posting Graduate Medical Education Regulations Training Completion Certificate

Union of India v. Tapash Basak

27 May 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:4301-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order remanding pay parity claims of SSB ministerial staff vis-à-vis ARC and SFF counterparts for reconsideration, dismissing the Union of India's challenge to the relief granted.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant trifurcation pay parity grade pay special allowance

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shiv Prasad Indramani; Shiv Prasad Indramani v. Mubin Ahmed

27 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's suo moto conversion of a Section 166 claim petition to Section 163-A, restricted compensation to the statutory amount of Rs. 5 lakhs without additional heads, and dismissed the claimants' appeal on negligence.

motor_vehicle_accident_compensation appeal_partly_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 163-A Section 164

Satpal Sharma & Anr. v. Sadhna Arora

27 May 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:4296

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order based on the landlord's better title established through a family settlement admitted as collateral evidence, dismissing the tenant's challenge for lack of contest.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction family settlement unregistered document

Paras Ram Dangal Society v. Estate Officer -IV DDA & Anr.

27 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4298

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a delayed appeal under the Public Premises Act, holding that the petitioner society was an unauthorized occupant and the delay in filing the appeal was not condonable.

property petition_dismissed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 condonation of delay unauthorized occupation limitation

Tarun Kumar Goyal v. MS SB Sales Corporation

27 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4412-DB

The High Court allowed the appeal and directed the trial court to accept the appellant's timely filed written statement after curing curable defects, restoring the right to defend the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement e-filing portal statement of truth affidavit of admission and denial