Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Jay Switches (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Sandhar Technologies Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an interlocutory injunction in a patent infringement suit, holding that numerical references in patent claims are binding aids for claim construction and that the respondents' fuel cap did not prima facie infringe the appellant's patent.
Union of India and Ors. v. Pradeep Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's delayed challenge to a Tribunal order granting second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme, affirming the binding nature of timely Tribunal findings on service classification.
Railtech Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the contractual disputes.
Krishan Lal @ Raj Suneja v. Surinder Mohan Jindal
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an ex parte decree caused by the lawyer's default and medical incapacity of the defendant, restoring the suit for fresh trial subject to deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs.
Ripu Daman Sahni v. Vivek Sahni
The Delhi High Court set aside warrants of attachment issued against the movable properties of a deceased judgment debtor and directed the execution court to bring legal representatives on record before proceeding further.
Sh Sukhvir Singh v. Sh Sunil Kumar Tanwar and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to compel impleadment of revenue officials as parties, affirming that they can be summoned as court witnesses to resolve the dispute over land ownership.
Classic Imports Inc. v. M/S Cornell Overseas Pvt Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court granted the defendant one final opportunity to examine an authorized attorney as witness despite delay, subject to costs and no further adjournments, balancing fairness with procedural discipline.
M/S. AIMS PROMOTERS PVT. v. Ms. Nazia Parveen
The Delhi High Court upheld the NCDRC's order fixing 18.11.2020 as the cut-off date for delay compensation in a consumer dispute over possession of flats, dismissing the petition challenging execution proceedings.
Charanpreet Singh & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections based on a voluntary amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing that continuation of criminal proceedings would be contrary to justice.
M/S Jannat Textiles v. Anil Khajanchi
The Delhi High Court upheld a summary decree under Order XXXVII CPC against a defendant who failed to comply with conditional leave to defend and confirmed that a cheque given as security creates a presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Union of India v. GP Capt Pravin Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force officer, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-related unless rebutted by positive evidence.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex MWO Anoop Singh
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law only.
Union of India & Ors. v. Brig Ranbir Singh Sehgal Retd
The Union of India sought and was granted leave to withdraw its writ petition against Brigadier Ranbir Singh Sehgal (Retd.), leading to the petition's disposal as withdrawn.
Union of India & Ors. v. CDR Shiv Ram Verma (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.
Sanal Kumar K v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Coast Guard to decide the petitioner's resignation application within two weeks, preserving the petitioner’s right to challenge the decision further.
Pravin Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pensionary benefits assured in the recruitment advertisement to APEDA employees appointed before 1994 cannot be denied by subsequent APEDA Regulations or government notifications, directing APEDA to disburse pension benefits under the CCS (Pension) Rules.
Om Prakash v. Satish Kumar & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's imposition of Rs. 40,000 cost for recalling a witness, holding that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is not to be exercised merely because the cost is considered high.
Nirmala @ Neelam v. Shardha
The High Court, exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, requested the Trial Court to prioritize and expedite disposal of a long-pending partition suit without issuing a formal time-bound direction.
Priya Jain v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a 2004 Will and the grant of probate, dismissing challenges of forgery and procedural irregularities raised by the testator's daughter.
Rotoffset Corporation v. Security Printing and Mining Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a PAC-based tender award, holding that a non-participating party who fails to timely challenge tender conditions lacks locus to seek judicial intervention.