Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
R Lalitha & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the cooperative housing society to transfer membership and facilitate mutation of ownership in favor of the lawful heirs holding Letters of Administration, granting them possession of the flat.
The Commissioner of Income Tax-International Taxation-3 v. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that interest received by the Indian Permanent Establishment of a foreign bank from its Head Office is not taxable in India for AY 2003-04, as the PE and Head Office are not separate entities and the payment is effectively to self.
Colgate Palmolive Company & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the criminal complaint and summoning order against Colgate and others for alleged forgery of trademark registration documents, holding that procedural safeguards were not followed and the documents did not prima facie constitute forgery.
Ravi Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing the Union of India to redraw the seniority list of Inspectors in CGST and Customs in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in K. Meghachandra Singh, dismissing the direct recruits' challenge.
Airports Authority of India v. TDI International India Pvt Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside arbitral awards on the ground that the arbitrator was unilaterally appointed and ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, holding such awards void ab initio and affirming that waiver requires express written agreement.
Umesh Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking demolition of alleged unauthorized construction on public land, holding the petitioner lacked locus standi as the matter was already pending before the court involving the land-owning agency.
Dr. Satendra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Nursing Council to reconsider its disability reservation policy inclusively and expeditiously, treating the petition as a representation without deciding on merits.
RT Vision Technologies Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that downgrading a vendor’s status without an opportunity of hearing violates natural justice and directed reconsideration of the decision with a speaking order while keeping the impugned order in abeyance.
M/S HARI ENTERPRISES v. SUPERINTENDENT, RANGE 25, CGST, MODEL TOWN DIVISION
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after the petitioner made a tax deposit post-cancellation.
M/S ROSMERTA HSRP VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court set aside retrospective cancellation of GST registration for lack of objective reasons and procedural fairness, restoring registration and directing compliance.
Sethia Enterprises v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after affording opportunity of personal hearing.
Madhur Computech Pvt. Ltd v. M/S Affordable Exports Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a lease agreement's arbitration clause constituted a valid arbitration agreement with New Delhi as the seat, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, overruling the respondents' jurisdictional objections.
Kalpatru Industries v. The Commissioner SGST Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective reasons and proper notice, setting aside retrospective cancellation from 2017 and limiting it to the date of the petitioner's cancellation application.
Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited v. Goods and Service Tax Officer Ward 203 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for failure to consider taxpayer's detailed replies and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
Errol Rajesh Dysell v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a deemed private university is not a public authority under the RTI Act and that personal student information sought is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j).
Dr Jaseela Majeed v. Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University
The Delhi High Court directed the University to provide relevant documents and a personal hearing before deciding on the petitioner's employment challenge, granting interim protection pending final order.
Krishan Gopal Yadav & Ors. v. The State GNCT, Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed charges under Sections 498A/34 and 509 IPC against petitioners due to lack of prima facie material and limitation bar, emphasizing the necessity of specific allegations at the charge framing stage.
INTERLINKS OVERSEAS PVT LTD & ORS. v. SOUTH DELHI PHARMA
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal condoning a 30-day delay in entering appearance in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, setting aside the dismissal of the condonation application subject to costs.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of an independent Administrator for Shri Kalkaji Mandir's management and redevelopment, clarified the scope of the Supreme Court's status quo order, and directed compliance with Court orders amid ongoing disputes and a tragic incident at the temple.
Rashme Bahl v. Ramnik Wadehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court approved a settlement in a partition suit among siblings involving disputed mortgage and sale of inherited properties, decreeing the suit in terms of the settlement and appointing a Commissioner to facilitate sale and payment.