Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Rulda Singh v. Rohit Sharma

28 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh

The Delhi High Court approved a mediated settlement resolving property disputes, allowed substitution of legal heirs, granted probate, and ordered refund of court fees, disposing of all connected suits accordingly.

civil settled mediation settlement agreement substitution of legal heirs Order XXII Rule 2 CPC

DELHI SOCCER PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

28 May 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4647-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to reply, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 61 CGST Act Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice

NIRMAAN MALHOTRA v. TUSHITA KAUL

28 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4693-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against the Family Court's maintenance order, condoned a short delay in filing the appeal, and held that unraised adultery allegations cannot be entertained on appeal without evidence.

family appeal_dismissed maintenance Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act condonation of delay allegation of adultery

Hemant Jain v. State

28 May 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:4365
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case based on the absence of direct evidence, prolonged pre-trial custody, and the principle that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain to deny bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Article 21

Preeti Singh v. Gopal Singh

28 May 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:4363

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's reduction of interim maintenance, holding that a wife capable of self-maintenance is not entitled to interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

family petition_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC revision petition revisional jurisdiction

HARMUNY ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD v. MAHUAA MEDIA PVT LTD

28 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4335

The Delhi High Court held that the Official Liquidator can disclaim onerous sub-leasehold property in liquidation, and secured creditors cannot claim rights superior to those of the terminated sub-lessee, directing possession to the sub-lessor.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 535 Companies Act onerous property disclaimer sub-lease termination secured creditor rights

Cement Manufacturers Association & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

28 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4467-DB

The Delhi High Court directed BIS to hear the cement manufacturers' grievances against the 2023 Quality Control Order mandating reduced ash content, stay coercive action pending a reasoned order, and disposed of the writ petition as a representation.

administrative other Procedural Quality Control Order 2023 Bureau of Indian Standards ash content in cement environmental impact

Rajesh Kumar Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.

28 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:4548

The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a bank loan guarantor in absence of criminal allegations, affirming that mere loan default does not justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Lookout Circular Right to travel abroad Article 21 Bank loan default

Deepak Goyal v. CBI

28 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:4417

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious economic offence case after considering prolonged pre-trial custody, limited sentencing powers of the trial court, and legal principles emphasizing bail as the rule and detention as the exception.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offence forgery cheating

Haider Ali v. Board of Control of Cricket in India & Ors.

28 May 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:4556-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions for BCCI and Delhi Capitals to pay Delhi Police for IPL security, holding that the police's policy decision not to charge fees is not subject to judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation Board of Control of Cricket in India Delhi Police Indian Premier League

Raj Kumar Aggarwal v. SMFG India Home Finance Company Ltd

28 May 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:4559-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that unregistered Agreements to Sell and General Powers of Attorney do not confer valid title in immovable property and dismissed the writ petition challenging mortgage enforcement and auction proceedings.

property petition_dismissed Significant unregistered Agreement to Sell General Power of Attorney immovable property registration

Abubacker E. v. National Investigation Agency

28 May 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4415-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of bail to a PFI leader under Section 43D(5) of UAPA, holding that the statutory bar applies to constitutional courts and that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusations are prima facie true.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 43D(5) UAPA bail under UAPA Popular Front of India terrorist conspiracy

Jitendra Kumar v. The Registrar of Trademarks, New Delhi & Anr.

28 May 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:4402

The Delhi High Court cancelled the registration of the trademark "WHITE BOY" held by Respondent No. 2, recognizing the petitioner’s prior and continuous use of the mark since 2010 and holding that prior user rights invalidate the subsequent registration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant prior user rights trademark registration passing off bona fide intention to use

Aurum Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. HT Media Ltd

28 May 2024 · Prateek Jalan

The Delhi High Court granted conditional stay on enforcement of an arbitral award holding that ostensible authority to bind promoters was not sufficiently established, emphasizing judicial discretion under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act and CPC provisions for stay of money awards.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Section 36 stay ostensible authority

Subhash Kumar Yadav v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

28 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4356

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner implicated only for booking train tickets used in narcotics transport, holding that limited involvement and absence of direct evidence justify bail under Section 439 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 CrPC NDPS Act intermediate quantity

Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company v. Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation -2, New Delhi

28 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4330-DB

The Delhi High Court held that guarantee charges received by a UK parent company from its Indian subsidiaries are not interest under the India-UK DTAA but accrue in India and are taxable as other income under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant guarantee charges interest Article 12 DTAA Article 23 DTAA

Wadia Techno Engineering Services Limited v. Director General of Married Accommodation Project & Anr.

28 May 2024 · Prateek Jalan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award rejecting enhancement claims based on project cost in the Vizag contract but upheld the rejection of prolongation and miscellaneous claims, affirming the validity of contractual clauses barring extra compensation for delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Consultancy contract Project cost enhancement Risk and cost contract

Progress Rail Locomotive Inc. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax (International Taxation), Circle - Noida & Ors.

28 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings against Progress Rail Locomotive Inc. by recognizing its Indian subsidiary as a Permanent Establishment under the India-USA DTAA, affirming the jurisdiction of the tax authorities.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment India-USA DTAA Fixed Place PE Service PE

Banty v. State (NCT of Delhi)

28 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:4292

The Delhi High Court held that electronic filing of the charge sheet constitutes valid filing under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., extinguishing the accused's right to statutory bail once filed within the stipulated period.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. statutory bail charge sheet filing electronic filing

Directorate of Enforcement v. Ajay S. Mittal

28 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:4419

The Delhi High Court quashed the transfer order of a criminal case alleging judicial bias due to lack of substantiated evidence and failure to afford the judge an opportunity to be heard, emphasizing the need for objective assessment of bias and caution in virtual court proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed Significant apprehension of bias transfer of case Section 408 CrPC audi alteram partem