Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sunil Rathore v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

29 May 2024 · Sachin Datta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Clause 8(ii) of the 2024 Guidelines arbitrarily barred release of diesel transport vehicles over 10 years old, violating Article 14, and directed release of seized vehicles seized before the guidelines subject to undertakings per the Seema Chopra judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant End of Life Vehicles Diesel transport vehicles Article 14 Arbitrariness

Mahesh Gupta v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs

29 May 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:4457

The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal of a patent application for a portable vehicle tracker, holding that the invention lacked inventive step as it was an obvious combination of prior art and common general knowledge.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant inventive step Indian Patent Act 1970 portable vehicle tracker prior art

The Statesman Ltd. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 May 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee

The Delhi High Court upheld the summary recovery of arrears under the Working Journalist Act, rejecting the appellant's claim of dispute and exemption due to heavy cash losses, and dismissed the appeals challenging the payment orders.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Working Journalist Act Majithia Wage Board Award Section 17(1) WJ Act Section 17(2) WJ Act

Suresh @ Sushma Ahuja and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

29 May 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4540-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition alleging kidnapping after the petitioners appeared voluntarily and denied unlawful confinement.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Article 226 Section 482 Cr.P.C. kidnapping

Sarita Kataria v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

29 May 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4550-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the Habeas Corpus petition after the petitioner’s brother was found residing freely at the stated address and appeared before the Court.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Writ Petition Custody Status Report

Prachin Shiv Mandir Avam Akhada Samiti v. Delhi Development and Ors.

29 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4423

The Delhi High Court upheld the DDA's authority to demolish an unauthorized temple in the Yamuna floodplain, dismissing the petitioner's claim of religious and property rights due to lack of legal title and public character.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 25 Constitution Delhi Development Authority Yamuna floodplain Unauthorized encroachments

Bharat Mohan Kohli v. State

29 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4520

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the registered Will of Late Man Mohan Kohli, granting Letter of Administration to the petitioner after rejecting challenges of mental incapacity, coercion, and forgery.

civil petition_allowed Significant Probate Will execution Testamentary capacity Indian Succession Act, 1925

Arun Sud v. Abha Sood & Ors.

29 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2531

The Delhi High Court dismissed the probate petition for a disputed Will with interpolations, held the testatrix died intestate, and decreed equal partition among heirs.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Will validity Probate Partition suit Indian Succession Act

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. M/S DSC LIMITED

29 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4519
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding the project completion date as 22.09.2010 and dismissed the Government's challenge to levy liquidated damages, clarifying that determination of delay is arbitrable while quantification of damages is not.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge liquidated damages excepted matters

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 v. Pavitra Realcon Pvt. Ltd.

29 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of income tax additions where no incriminating material was found during search and principles of natural justice were violated, dismissing Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 Section 153C Section 68

Urmila Devi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

29 May 2024 · Sachin Datta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Board's 2017 policy denying renewal of multipurpose stall licenses, dismissing writ petitions challenging the policy and COVID-19 related license extensions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Multipurpose Stall Policy License renewal Commercial Circular No. 61 of 2017 Article 226 jurisdiction

Mohd Jabir v. Union of India

28 May 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4750-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a preventive detention order under the PITNDPS Act due to unexplained delay and failure to provide the petitioner with relied upon material, emphasizing the necessity of a live nexus and procedural fairness in detention cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention PITNDPS Act unexplained delay subjective satisfaction

Usha Barthwal v. The Registrar General, High Court of Delhi

28 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4686-DB

The Delhi High Court held that discrepancies in the recorded name of an employee’s deceased father do not justify denial or impact of retirement benefits when the names refer to the same person.

administrative petition_allowed name discrepancy retirement benefits service records official documents

Sterling and Wilson Private Ltd v. M/s Sharma Turnkey Engineers Pvt Ltd

28 May 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4342-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and condoned an 18-day delay in filing an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, restoring the challenge to the arbitral award for adjudication on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 condonation of delay limitation period

M/S PRIME INDUSTRIES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER & ORS.

28 May 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4648-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction, proper notice, and opportunity to be heard, and modified the cancellation date to the petitioner's application date.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act Show Cause Notice

J.B.Boda Surveyors Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Sharma & Anr

28 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4617

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award directing reinstatement and 50% back wages to a workman illegally terminated without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor petition_dismissed Significant illegal termination Section 25-F Industrial Disputes Act reinstatement back wages

Munna Lal v. Ashbee Systems (P) Ltd and Anr

28 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh, J · 2024:DHC:4619

The Delhi High Court upheld a Labour Court award granting lump-sum compensation instead of reinstatement with back wages to a workman illegally terminated sixteen years prior, affirming that reinstatement is not an automatic right in such cases.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25-F illegal termination reinstatement

D.T.C. v. Vir Sain

28 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4620

The High Court upheld the Labour Court's award reinstating a workman, holding that procedural lapses in departmental enquiry violated natural justice and warranted interference under Article 226.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry principles of natural justice defense assistant preliminary enquiry

Lal Bahadur Prop. of M/s ICRTC v. M/s Samriddhi Electromart Pvt. Ltd.

28 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4692-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's decree for recovery, holding that the appellant failed to prove a binding settlement with the respondent and that the respondent was entitled to recover the outstanding amount based on invoices and cheque evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed settlement agreement burden of proof recovery suit cheque payments

Hewlett Packard Financial Services India Private Limited v. Apple Color Lab & Anr.

28 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4495

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a lease agreement due to the respondents' failure to respond to arbitration notices.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause