Delhi High Court

46,428 judgments

Year:

M/S Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Amit Dahanukar & Anr

30 May 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:2979
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application in a trademark dispute due to forum shopping, delay, and acquiescence, emphasizing judicial comity and the continuing cause of action doctrine.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement interim injunction forum shopping judicial comity

Aditi Chauhan & Anr. v. Rajani Chauhan & Anr.

30 May 2019 · Vinod Goel · 2019:DHC:2981

The Delhi High Court held that adult daughters owning a flat by conveyance deed can sell the property without parental consent or court permission despite a prior divorce decree condition restricting sale during their minority.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 151 CPC Hindu Marriage Act divorce decree minor property rights

Ambika Vikas Udyog v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Delhi Zonal Unit & Anr.

30 May 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Asha Menon · 2019:DHC:2961-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that DRI lacked authority to instruct MMTC to withhold the petitioner’s bank guarantee without formal seizure, quashing such instructions and directing release of the security pending adjudication.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 110(3) bank guarantee security deposit

Aman Singh v. The State

30 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2984

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused of heinous sexual offences under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the gravity of the charges and supporting evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6 POCSO heinous offences

Rakesh Dhingra v. The State of NCT of Delhi

30 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2985

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420 and 120B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent oppression and futility.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC compromise in criminal cases civil dispute in criminal proceedings

Rajeev Kapoor v. Janak Kapoor & Anr.

30 May 2019 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2021:DHC:3954

The Delhi High Court upheld the absolute ownership of Janak Kapoor over the suit property, dismissed Rajeev Kapoor's counter-claim challenging mutation, conveyance, and gift deeds, and rejected his adverse possession plea as unsustainable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mutation conveyance deed gift deed adverse possession

M/S Anglo American Exploration (I) Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

29 May 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:2878

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of M/s Anglo American Exploration (I) Private Limited upon satisfaction of statutory compliance and non-prejudicial conduct.

corporate petition_allowed voluntary winding up Companies Act 1956 Official Liquidator Declaration of Solvency

Pinkibisht; Bandana Mishra; Kavita Mishra v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited and Anr.

29 May 2019 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2019:DHC:7596

The Delhi High Court held that electricity connections cannot be granted to unauthorized properties subject to valid demolition and sealing orders under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized construction demolition order sealing order electricity connection

Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v. JC Bamford Investment Ltd.

29 May 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Asha Menon · 2019:DHC:7389-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed income tax appeals as withdrawn following a Competent Authority Resolution under the Mutual Agreement Procedure accepted by the assessee.

tax appeal_dismissed Mutual Agreement Procedure Income Tax Appeals Competent Authority Resolution International Taxation

Chander Kanta Mishra & Anr v. Raj Sharma & Ors

29 May 2019 · Yogesh Khanna · 2019:DHC:2937

The Delhi High Court held that a foreign probate accompanied by an apostille certificate is valid under Indian law to substitute legal heirs in a partition suit, setting aside the trial court's rejection of such substitution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant foreign probate apostille certificate Indian Succession Act Order XXII CPC

Rajender Singh v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

29 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2949

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 354, and 354(B) IPC on the ground that the parties had amicably settled their dispute, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction settlement of dispute

Liyakat Ali & Anr v. The State & Anr

29 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2953

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, and 34 IPC based on settlement between parties and the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC settlement between parties inherent jurisdiction

Dinesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

29 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2952

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354B, and 34 IPC on the ground of settled dispute between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC with conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction settlement deed

Sanjay Khurana & Anr v. The State & Anr

29 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2951

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions to quash FIRs under trade mark and copyright laws based on a settlement, applying Section 482 CrPC to criminal cases with predominant civil elements.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC commercial dispute intellectual property

Sanjay Khurana & Anr v. The State & Anr

29 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2950

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under trade mark and copyright laws arising from a commercial dispute settled between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR commercial dispute settlement

Akash Maheshwari & Ors v. The State & Anr

29 May 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:2948

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Munjal Aviation Pvt. Ltd. v. Official Liquidator

29 May 2019 · Jayant Nath, J. · 2019:DHC:2955

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up of Munjal Aviation Private Limited under Section 497 of the Companies Act, 1956, after finding full compliance with statutory requirements and solvency.

corporate petition_allowed Members Voluntary Winding Up Declaration of Solvency Companies Act 1956 Official Liquidator

Gajinder Singh v. The State

29 May 2019 · R. K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:2942

The Delhi High Court restored the appellant's criminal appeal, upheld his conviction for robbery, but set aside the sentence on finding he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, following Supreme Court precedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenility juvenile justice sentence set aside conviction maintained

NCC LTD v. SOM DATT BUILDERS PVT. LTD.

29 May 2019 · Navin Chawla · 2019:DHC:2943

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award dismissing the petitioner's claim as barred by limitation, holding that the cause of action accrued upon repudiation of the claim in 2009 and was not a continuing cause of action.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 law of limitation cause of action Joint Venture Agreement

Indian Progressive Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd.

29 May 2019 · Navin Chawla · 2019:DHC:2941

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award in a mining lease dispute, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting the petitioner's claims for refund and non-performance.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 34 Arbitration Act Arbitral award challenge Fundamental policy of Indian law Patent illegality